Titlebook: Choosing a Leader; Party Leadership Con Leonard P. Stark Book 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1996 Affe

Agronomy

Campaigns,The broad features of leadership campaigns do differ depending on the selection system being used. However, as will be seen in this chapter, it is easy to overestimate the extent to which the rules determine campaign strategies.

大看台

Outcomes,s as diverse as a small party elite, a party’s MPs, a college representing sections of the party, or a party’s entire membership. It is frequently suggested that these different electorates. rely on different criteria in deciding which candidate to support.

Negotiate

流浪者

Limited

Labour,dst of a bitter civil war. In one of the bloodiest battles, the party overhauled its leadership selection system, replacing the election by MPs with an electoral college in which the PLP retained only 30 per cent of the votes.

Myelin

Vulnerable

猜忌

Conservatives,ring, Harold Macmillan decided he would resign as prime minister and party leader. Macmillan had initially taken the opposite decision. On the very day he told the cabinet of his intention to remain leader through the next general election, however, his health unexpectedly deteriorated. He was hospi

真实的你

Labour, Labour Party (PLP) elected Callaghan to succeed Wilson in 1976, Labour MPs had effectively chosen Britain’s last two prime ministers. At the time, Labour’s leadership selection system was praised for being straightforward, practical, and efficient.. Not one of the Labour MPs Henry Drucker interview

高兴去去

Third Parties,cratic Party (SDP) was founded, mostly by former members of the Labour Party. For the next seven years the Liberals and the SDP operated within an Alliance, cooperating in many respects (most notably by refraining from putting their parliamentary candidates up against one another) while retaining th