Titlebook: Choctaw Verb Agreement and Universal Grammar; William D. Davies Book 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1986 Affix.Synt

Acupressure

theta-waves

Dative Subjects,Data examined in Chapter 3 show that indirect objects, beneficiaries, and possessors may all determine dative agreement. In this chapter I turn to clauses such as (1) and (2), in which what appears to be the subject determines dative agreement.

极深

躺下残杀

Epithelium

Stephanie Fletcher,Nicholas M. Barnesmines dative agreement, such as (1b) and (2b), as “dative direct object” constructions. In (1a) the second person singular nominal determines accusative agreement, . ‘2ACC’, while in (1b) it determines dative agreement, . ‘2DAT’. In both, the first person singular nominal determines nominative agreement . ‘1NOM’.

PHIL

CYN

Colonoscopy

CHOKE

The Interaction of Agreement and Case, the result is an account superior to one that takes agreement and case as lexical properties as has been proposed elsewhere in the Choctaw literature and to a specific account proposed by Heath (1977).

钉牢

,Explaining students’ educational aspirations,al aspirations and to identify differences in the background-adjusted probability to plan to complete the highest level of general education between natives and migrants. In line with common specifications of models of educational aspirations, expectations and choice, the analysis proceeds in a stepwise manner.