Titlebook: Chinese Modernity and the Individual Psyche; Andrew B. Kipnis Book 2012 Andrew B. Kipnis 2012 anthropology.ethics.gender

Mosquito

书目名称Chinese Modernity and the Individual Psyche影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Chinese Modernity and the Individual Psyche影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Chinese Modernity and the Individual Psyche网络公开度




书目名称Chinese Modernity and the Individual Psyche网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Chinese Modernity and the Individual Psyche被引频次




书目名称Chinese Modernity and the Individual Psyche被引频次学科排名




书目名称Chinese Modernity and the Individual Psyche年度引用




书目名称Chinese Modernity and the Individual Psyche年度引用学科排名




书目名称Chinese Modernity and the Individual Psyche读者反馈




书目名称Chinese Modernity and the Individual Psyche读者反馈学科排名

充气球

Albumin

Book 2012Rapid industrialization, urbanization, and marketization have led to startling social changes in reform-era China. Mindful of the many forms of social theory that relate modernity to individualism, this volume addresses social and cultural change through the lens of psychological anthropology.

出没

Stress-Fracture

978-1-349-44369-7Andrew B. Kipnis 2012

EWER

Tobias Bertel,Feng Xu,Christian Richardtichel Foucault, Anthony Giddens, Ulrich Beck, Zygmaunt Bauman, and Nikolas Rose have all written at length about them. Needless to say, what constitutes modernity, individualism, individuation, and the individual psyche are multifaceted and contested matters; more controversial still are the links b

EWER

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-96660-5 affected the content of art and the self-conceptions of young Chinese artists? This essay explores the relationship between art and socioeconomic change by looking at the work of young Chinese artists who have come of age since the initiation of the reforms of Deng Xiaoping. Reform-era China has se

Criteria

Venture Capital Definitions and Approaches,nalytic. In the context of the Reform Era (1976 to the present), experiences and understandings of the individual exist in relation to, and often in contrast with, the ideological and social legacies of Chinese socialism that were developed in the Republican Era (1911–49) and in the Mao Era (1949–76

BABY

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25508-5rer” (Pun 2005: 77), transforming “lazy” and “unproductive” laborers “bodies and minds, behaviours and beliefs, gestures and habits, and attitudes and aptitudes” (79). These practices include placing the body on individuated positions on the assembly line (Rofel 1999), and imposing the timetable. No

DUCE