找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Chinese Lawmaking: From Non-communicative to Communicative; Peng He Book 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 Chinese.Communicative

[复制链接]
查看: 44179|回复: 42
发表于 2025-3-21 17:29:15 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Chinese Lawmaking: From Non-communicative to Communicative
编辑Peng He
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/226/225831/225831.mp4
概述The first book about Chinese Lawmaking, from the perspective of jurisprudence (fills the research gap).Uses up-to-date statistical research and analysis to help the reader understand Chinese lawmaking
丛书名称Understanding China
图书封面Titlebook: Chinese Lawmaking: From Non-communicative to Communicative;  Peng He Book 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 Chinese.Communicative
描述Dr Peng He in her book addresses various issues, drawing on Western and Chinese sources for her argument for a ‘communicative’ theory of law making. This book is both timely and important in the Chinese context. Her argument depends upon the insight that what is important in societies is not just representative democracy but ‘voice’ - the opportunity for individuals to be heard and bring their input into official systems.More than that, she argues that this can also take further the idea of living by the rules as something that is not to be seen as narrow Legalism but as something more akin to living ‘righteously’ – a view which is resonant with parts of Chinese legal thought. This book is also important in the present Chinese context in another way. The developing economy necessitates substantial legal reform.But applying Western models to China can often be naïve and not fully fulfil their intended purpose. Peng He’s work addresses this by looking at the process of legislation in connection with legal reform. It is grounded in a sound theoretical reflection of both the process of legal transplantation and the process of law making, and looks both at Western and Chinese sources. S
出版日期Book 2014
关键词Chinese; Communicative; Jurisprudence; Lawmaking
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39507-9
isbn_softcover978-3-662-52429-9
isbn_ebook978-3-642-39507-9Series ISSN 2196-3134 Series E-ISSN 2196-3142
issn_series 2196-3134
copyrightSpringer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Chinese Lawmaking: From Non-communicative to Communicative影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Chinese Lawmaking: From Non-communicative to Communicative影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Chinese Lawmaking: From Non-communicative to Communicative网络公开度




书目名称Chinese Lawmaking: From Non-communicative to Communicative网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Chinese Lawmaking: From Non-communicative to Communicative被引频次




书目名称Chinese Lawmaking: From Non-communicative to Communicative被引频次学科排名




书目名称Chinese Lawmaking: From Non-communicative to Communicative年度引用




书目名称Chinese Lawmaking: From Non-communicative to Communicative年度引用学科排名




书目名称Chinese Lawmaking: From Non-communicative to Communicative读者反馈




书目名称Chinese Lawmaking: From Non-communicative to Communicative读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

1票 100.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:49:34 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39507-9Chinese; Communicative; Jurisprudence; Lawmaking
发表于 2025-3-22 03:32:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 04:50:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:25:03 | 显示全部楼层
Understanding Chinahttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/225831.jpg
发表于 2025-3-22 15:16:45 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84198-9y is translated into a representative system, a system that the minority is subordinate to the majority. It is a rule-based system and actors in this system are under an obligation to follow the rules, and they take little participation in making rules. However, as Professor Zenon Bankowski argued i
发表于 2025-3-22 18:41:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 21:14:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:48:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:02:10 | 显示全部楼层
Topology of Real Algebraic Varieties,ries I discussed in Chap. 5 in its deliberations on freedom and the legitimacy of the social contract. Bentham and Waldron debated on a collective sense of legislation: the principles of utility and the majority decisions were more or less relate to ‘collective morality’. Hayek debated on a social s
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-14 23:21
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表