找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Children‘s Rights in International Politics; The Transformative P Anna Holzscheiter Book 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan P

[复制链接]
楼主: VIRAL
发表于 2025-3-23 10:15:30 | 显示全部楼层
Stephen Karesh,Medhat Sam Gabriels clear that the Polish draft changed significantly during the ten years of negotiations. Not only was the wording of suggested articles altered, but several new items were also added to the catalogue of children’s rights. Accordingly, while the second Polish proposal was the main reference point fo
发表于 2025-3-23 15:58:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 18:20:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 00:32:16 | 显示全部楼层
Transformations of the Statehttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/225288.jpg
发表于 2025-3-24 05:03:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 09:47:59 | 显示全部楼层
Power and Exclusion in Discourse Approaches to International Relations discourse-based approaches to IR contributes to the present heterogeneity of this field. However, it also encourages an opening up of the discipline towards debates and concepts from other areas of social inquiry.
发表于 2025-3-24 13:53:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 17:12:19 | 显示全部楼层
Global Childhood — an Essentially Uncontested Concept?h would move this document to almost universal acceptance (with only Somalia not having ratified). When the Supreme Court made its decision, Justice Kennedy, speaking for the majority of the judges, stated ‘[r]etribution is not proportional if the law’s most severe penalty is imposed on one whose cu
发表于 2025-3-24 22:25:54 | 显示全部楼层
Origins of the Drafting of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Childtion supports the argument that ‘at least at the level of norm-creation there […] appears to exist a strong consensus among states as to the substance and universal applicability of the rights of the child’ (Harris-Short, 2003: 135). This also seems to be confirmed by the fact that the draft was ent
发表于 2025-3-24 23:22:07 | 显示全部楼层
Discursive Practices within the UN and the Transformation of a Global Childhood Paradigm the Convention’s title that figured in the drafters’ discussions: (1) The rights-holder covered by the Convention: should it address ‘children’ as a group or the ‘child’ as an individual?. (2) The terminology used for the nature of rights contained in the possible Convention. Concerning the first q
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-24 16:49
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表