用户名  找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Casualties of Causality; Peter Dahler-Larsen Book 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 Resea

[复制链接]
楼主: BRISK
发表于 2025-3-23 12:07:49 | 显示全部楼层
Twenty-five Questions,de: Is causation the most important and honorable task in the social sciences? Is causality only one thing? Will social science cleanse itself of ideology and normativity, if it restricts itself to causal analysis? Does causation always require a counterfactual? Can you sell your study by pretending
发表于 2025-3-23 16:03:41 | 显示全部楼层
Casualties of Causality and Paths to the Future,e Causality Syndrome include lack of truthfulness about details, which constitute threats to the validity of causal claims. Another problem is lack of attention to what exactly constitutes the difference between an intervention group and a control group. In a broader perspective, a too strong focus
发表于 2025-3-23 18:06:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 22:18:51 | 显示全部楼层
Sound Wave Reflection from the Ocean Floor,logy and normativity, if it restricts itself to causal analysis? Does causation always require a counterfactual? Can you sell your study by pretending that its design is better than it actually is? Well-reflected answers to these questions may lead to a revision of one’s position vis-à-vis The Causality Syndrome.
发表于 2025-3-24 04:21:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 07:41:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 11:46:24 | 显示全部楼层
Casualties of Causality and Paths to the Future, attention to what exactly constitutes the difference between an intervention group and a control group. In a broader perspective, a too strong focus on causation may lead to a bias in the selection of topics for research. The chapter suggests three paths to the future.
发表于 2025-3-24 17:34:22 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2022 causal studies as more important than other studies, a narrow definition of causality, and rules of thumb regarding how to make causal claims. The book argues that the present dominance of this syndrome has considerable downsides and presents a challenge to social science. The book dissects the man
发表于 2025-3-24 20:53:24 | 显示全部楼层
The Causality Syndrome,f thought and controversy between the positions. However, when fast and less reflexive thinking reigns, then monism, usurpation, simplification and institutionalization lead to the present dominance of The Causality Syndrome.
发表于 2025-3-25 01:59:55 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-7-9 00:30
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表