Titlebook: Cartesian Spacetime; Descartes’ Physics a Edward Slowik Book 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002 Cartesian.Issac Newton.Ren

蘑菇

CLOT

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32164-6wton’s allegations by undermining one of the key premises in its construction: that a matter-filled universe cannot allow unchanging spatial positions. In short, if some sort of fixed reference point can be located in the Cartesian plenum, then a method of tracking a moving body’s velocity over time

转向

Introductionrmining if it is possible to formulate a Cartesian theory of science that can avoid the problems raised by Newton, as well as by a host of other past and contemporary philosophers either sympathetic or hostile to the overall design of Cartesian science. In particular, if Descartes’ theory of motion

CRUMB

ineptitude

确定方向

金盘是高原

projectile

Relational Spacetimes and Cartesian Dynamicsject by overviewing the work of various commentators on the interpretation of Cartesian motion, with particular emphasis placed upon the recent important texts of D. Garber and D. Des Chene. In contrast to the methodology of most previous treatments of Cartesian motion, however, Part III, like Part

drusen

The Kinematic Logic of Relational Transfer: An Unwritten Chapter in the History of Cartesian Motione to its neighborhood. The importance of these “supplementary” criteria cannot be overestimated, for they would seem to compromise the “strong” form of relational motion normally attributed to Descartes; since, to be more specific, these criteria would appear to challenge Descartes’ principal judgme

JAUNT

Constructing a Cartesian Dynamics without “Fixed” Reference Frames: Collisions in the Center-of-Mass a consistent set of material-interaction laws . recourse to permanent reference frames. In this regard, Huygens’ concept of a center-of-mass reference frame will prove invaluable, for it constitutes the a further means of preserving the basic content of Descartes’ collision rules without jeopardizi