书目名称 | Canon Controversies in Political Thought | 副标题 | Two Theories of Infl | 编辑 | Dominic Welburn | 视频video | http://file.papertrans.cn/222/221332/221332.mp4 | 概述 | Demonstrates how a more historically-driven conceptual analysis of influence is needed.Defends the Orrian model over the Nietzschean to meet the challenging diversity of political theories in the twen | 图书封面 |  | 描述 | This book explores the meaning of ‘influence‘, which has played a central role in the formation of the canon, or tradition, of Western political thought. Via a critical overview of the relative fortunes of influence studies in the history of political thought, literary theory, and – at times – the history of art and poetry, it is possible to identify a dominant theory of the term. Nietzschean and ‘emanational’ in nature, thanks largely to the work of Harold Bloom, this particular theory views influence as mere power and represents a broadly accepted meaning in twentieth century thought. Canons or traditions of thought came to be institutions in themselves reflecting prevalent social and political inequalities. To be sure, a theory of influence as power came to be seen as complicit in arbitrary canon formation, across a range of disciplines. The book argues, ultimately, that a second theory of influence, imported from Mary Orr’s work on intertextuality, affords a rival perspective and amore positive, intergenerational meaning of influence. Orr’s ‘braided rope’ theory of influence allows for the development of a plurality of canons each capable of constructing new histories for a var | 出版日期 | Book 2020 | 关键词 | Western political thought; histories of political thought; plurality of canons; notion of influence; mea | 版次 | 1 | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41361-3 | isbn_ebook | 978-3-030-41361-3 | copyright | The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl |
The information of publication is updating
|
|