设为首页收藏本站
开启辅助访问 切换到窄版

 找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步，快速开始

扫一扫，访问微社区

  • ALL
  • Journals
  • Books

派博传思国际中心 »期刊书目

› BOOKS
› BOOKS with Alphabet C (Ca, Cb,Cc, Cd, Ce…... )

1234下一页
返回列表

Titlebook: Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?; Jack Li Book 20021st edition Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002 Epicurus.death.is

[复制链接]
查看: 39915|回复: 36
发表于 2025-3-21 17:00:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?
编辑Jack Li
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/221/220988/220988.mp4
概述Includes supplementary material:
图书封面Titlebook: Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?; Jack Li Book 20021st edition Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002 Epicurus.death.is
描述lt is with great pleasure that I write this preface for Or Li‘s book, wh ich addresses the venerable and vexing issues surrounding the problem of whether death can be a harm to the person who dies. This problem is an ancient one which was raised long ago by the early Greek philosopher Epicurus, who notoriously argued that death is at no time a harm to its ‘victim‘ because before death there is no harrn and after death there is no victim. Epicurus‘s conclusion is conspicuously at odds with our prereflective­ and in most cases our post-reflective-intuitions, and numerous strategies have therefore been proposed to refute or avoid the Epicurean conclusion that death cannot be an evil after all. How then are we to account for our intuition that death is not just an evil, but perhaps the worst evil: that may befall us? This is the key issue that Or Li addresses. Or Li‘s book explores various alternative approaches to the complex and difficult issues surrounding Epicurus‘s notorious argument and provides a defence ofthe intuitively plausible conclusion that death can indeed be a harm to the person who dies. This challenge to Epicurus‘s claim that death is never a harm to the person who di
出版日期Book 20021st edition
关键词Epicurus; death; issue; time
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9868-2
isbn_softcover978-90-481-5973-4
isbn_ebook978-94-015-9868-2
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?网络公开度




书目名称Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?被引频次




书目名称Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?被引频次学科排名




书目名称Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?年度引用




书目名称Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?年度引用学科排名




书目名称Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?读者反馈




书目名称Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
1.jpg
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics
2.jpg
 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty
3.jpg
 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory
4.jpg
 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance
5.jpg
 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage
您所在的用户组没有投票权限
风俗习惯
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-21 20:43:59 | 显示全部楼层
DEFT
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 02:56:51 | 显示全部楼层
Expiration
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 05:25:42 | 显示全部楼层
Indicative
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 11:55:33 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion, him I have shown, in Chapter One, that the Epicurean argument is defective. Hence, at this point, I can at least claim that it is possible that death . be a harm to the person who dies. However, to really secure this conclusion, it is necessary to give further justification.
CIS
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 14:45:35 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-9777-8 him I have shown, in Chapter One, that the Epicurean argument is defective. Hence, at this point, I can at least claim that it is possible that death . be a harm to the person who dies. However, to really secure this conclusion, it is necessary to give further justification.
易达到
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 19:35:17 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-9777-8 him I have shown, in Chapter One, that the Epicurean argument is defective. Hence, at this point, I can at least claim that it is possible that death . be a harm to the person who dies. However, to really secure this conclusion, it is necessary to give further justification.
易达到
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 23:10:34 | 显示全部楼层
Spontane intrazerebrale BlutungenThe Epicurean argument has provided the classical objection to the widely held view that death can be a harm to the person who dies. To attain the central aim of this book, first of all, I want to refute Epicurus in this chapter.
Eructation
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-23 02:34:09 | 显示全部楼层
Spontane intrazerebrale BlutungenThis chapter is concerned with the questions: Is the desire-thwarting theory acceptable? If not, why? Let me outline this theory first.
pessimism
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-23 05:55:11 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12382-5The deprivation theory is the most popular anti-Epicurean view.1 Silverstein calls this view the standard argument against the Epicurean view.2 In this chapter, I want to investigate whether or not this very popular anti-Epicurean view is satisfactory. To begin this task, let me first illustrate the deprivation theory.
blister
回复

举报

下一页 »
1234下一页
返回列表
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-17 12:34
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表