Titlebook: Camus‘ Literary Ethics; Between Form and Con Grace Whistler Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice

spondylosis

aesthetic

严峻考验

Nebulous

压碎

心痛

Introduction: Context, Form, and Content,writer, he struggled with the development of his own style, but here I suggest that this was driven by the desire to forge new ways of doing philosophy and to develop philosophical form which was not only appropriate but also in some ways indivisible from its ethical content. I suggest that Camus wa

镀金

Subdue

Narrating the Absurd,ve experiences of Meursault, based on its direct, clear, and unmediated language. I suggest that the simplicity of certain writing styles suspends particular types of aesthetic judgements, instead allowing moral and personal features of the character to become more salient. I suggest that this techn

temperate

Myths, Fables, Parables, Allegories,ks of Camus. Drawing on theoretical work from Lacoue-Labarthe’s ., I argue that philosophy is bound by style, and as such, works which embrace the ambiguities of their medium are perhaps a more appropriate method of approaching the uncertainties of lived experience than contemporary analytic methods

排斥

Dialogic Ethics,ic approach to philosophical problems. I introduce my own concept of ‘dialogic ethics’, referring to a method of moral problem solving which I identify as being present in the novels of both authors. I suggest that by engaging imaginatively with the characters of novels as moral agents, dialogue giv