Titlebook: Cabinets in Western Europe; Jean Blondel (External Professor of Political Scie Book 1997Latest edition Jean Blondel and Ferdinand Müller-R

inroad

书目名称Cabinets in Western Europe影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Cabinets in Western Europe影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Cabinets in Western Europe网络公开度




书目名称Cabinets in Western Europe网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Cabinets in Western Europe被引频次




书目名称Cabinets in Western Europe被引频次学科排名




书目名称Cabinets in Western Europe年度引用




书目名称Cabinets in Western Europe年度引用学科排名




书目名称Cabinets in Western Europe读者反馈




书目名称Cabinets in Western Europe读者反馈学科排名

Overthrow

The United Kingdom,nt of government’, the source of most legislative and administrative decisions, and the body that is most fully involved in the major decisions of government (Mackintosh, 1977). This conventional view of the cabinet emphasises its position ‘at the apex of the executive’ (Gordon Walker, 1973) and its

fibroblast

callous

Encumber

Belgium: A Complex Cabinet in a Fragmented Polity, listed in the constitution, but he does not have personal responsibility as his decision must be countersigned by a minister in order to be valid. On the other hand, his person is inviolable in both the public and private (civil and penal) fields. The King and the ministers belong simultaneously to

Nomadic

France: Cabinet Decision-Making under the Fifth Republic,ence of a public debate between the members of the government in an article entitled ‘Governing differently’ (., 20 April 1982). This point of view divided the members of the government as well as the majority because it acted counter to the traditional conception of governmental decision-making whi

Nomadic

incontinence

follicle

Austria: Routine and Ritual,l Government, as the collective top executive body is officially called. This is rather surprising, since the political culture of the country usually places a great deal of emphasis on legality and legal regulations. However, the few explicit norms concerning the cabinet have been supplemented by c

CHASE