Titlebook: Between Protection and Harm; Negotiated Vulnerabi Luc Leboeuf,Cathrine Brun,Sylvie Sarolea Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2025 The Editor(s) (if applicable)

filicide

危险

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63791-0both a humanitarian and a restrictive perspective on asylum policies. This will be done thanks to research carried out in Italian reception centers, including interviews with migrants and social workers and 6-months ethnographic observations.

Fibrillation

猛然一拉

Metal-Based Composite Nanomaterialsting or ‘proving’ vulnerability and thus eligibility for procedural accommodation. Of particular concern is the difficulty with accessing psychological assessments for psychologically vulnerable asylum seekers and their inconsistent consideration by decision makers. Another key concern is the discre

改正

Reactions of Higher Alkanes with Hydrogen,ifferences in the municipalities and German states, which was also reflected in our interviewees’ experiences. These differences and the attempts of federal and state authorities to collaborate in matters of accommodation and return procedures will be discussed throughout this chapter, and what this

phytochemicals

fertilizer

2364-4087 itarian replies from states and the international community to refugee movements – including in their implied exclusionary dimensions that generate contestations and implementation difficulties which, if not ta978-3-031-69810-1978-3-031-69808-8Series ISSN 2364-4087 Series E-ISSN 2364-4095

ARBOR

Introduction. Between Protection and Harm. Negotiated Vulnerabilities in Asylum Laws and Bureaucracand delays in preparing the asylum interview, interview by a specially trained public servant, etc) (UNHCR, 2011; Dir 2013/33/EU; Dir 2013/32/EU). ‘Vulnerability’ can also be an overall consideration, to be integrated in transversal ways while designing asylum and migration policies, as well as the

欺骗世家

Positionalities in Research and the Question of Migrants’ Vulnerabilityhe Chapter emphasises the interaction between our positionality (as researchers) and the positionality of the people we interviewed. The analysis represents a way to reflect on the challenges of comparative and ethnographic methodologies through the lenses of feminist and general critical scholarshi

凶兆