| 期刊全称 | Building Bioethics | | 期刊简称 | Conversations with C | | 影响因子2023 | Loretta M. Kopelman | | 视频video | http://file.papertrans.cn/192/191583/191583.mp4 | | 图书封面 |  | | 影响因子 | K. Danner Clouser is one of the most important figures inestablishing and shaping the fields of medical ethics, bioethics, andthe philosophy of education in the second half of the twentiethcentury. Clouser challenged many established approaches to moraltheory and offered innovative strategies for integrating thehumanities into professional education, especially that of physiciansand nurses. The contributions published in .Building Bioethics:Conversations with Clouser and Friends on Medical Ethics. are uniqueboth in their devotion to a critical review of his contributions, andin bringing together internationally known figures in bioethics,medical ethics, and philosophy of medicine to comment upon Clouser‘swork. These leaders of the field include Tom Beauchamp, DanielCallahan, James Childress, Nancy Dubler, H. Tristram Engelhardt, AlJonsen, Loretta Kopelman, Larry McCullough, John Moskop, and RobertVeatch. This book merits special attention from those interested inbioethics, philosophy of medicine, medical ethics, philosophy, medicaleducation, religious studies, and nursing education. | | Pindex | Book 20021st edition |
| 1 |
Front Matter |
|
|
Abstract
|
| 2 |
Building the New Field of Bioethics |
Loretta M. Kopelman |
|
Abstract
|
| 3 |
Principles or Rules? |
Tom L. Beauchamp |
|
Abstract
At the 25th Anniversary of the Hastings Center, Dan Clouser and I traversed Manhattan Island together in a seat on a fume-filled bus. We had been in attendance at perhaps the most splendid retirement we will ever see in bioethics, that of Willard Gaylin. Half of Manhattan was in attendance at the biggest hall of the United Nations, where Dan Clouser was himself honored as master of ceremonies for the event. As we crept across Manhattan in the bus, Clouser and I discussed the then-recent turn to methodological questions in bioethics. Why, he wondered out loud, had it taken bioethics so long to move beyond the staple normative questions of bioethics and ask the underlying methodological and more theoretical questions that are almost second nature to a philosopher?.As is so typical of Clouser, a positive thesis emerged: Clouser thought that bioethics was finally maturing and coming into its own as a field. It could now afford to step back and reflect on its own methodology and on second-order problems, not merely to rely on the methodology of other fields and first-order problems. Should this thesis turn out to be true, there can be little doubt that the career of Dan Clouser is one r
|
| 4 |
Ethics from the Top Down: A View from the Well |
Daniel Callahan |
|
Abstract
|
| 5 |
The Influence of K. Danner Clouser: The Importance of Interpersonal Skills and Multidisciplinary Edu |
Nancy Neveloff Dubler |
|
Abstract
It is an honor to have been asked to contribute to this Festschrift. We have all learned from each other over the decades, but K. Danner Clouser had a gentleness in his teaching and personal style that was unique. I add my notes of admiration to this chorus of appreciation.
|
| 6 |
Moral Knowledge, Moral Narrative, and K. Danner Clouser: The Search for Phronesis |
H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr. |
|
Abstract
|
| 7 |
The Wittiest Ethicist |
Albert R. Jonsen |
|
Abstract
|
| 8 |
Are Better Problem-Solvers Better People? |
Loretta M. Kopelman |
|
Abstract
|
| 9 |
The Liberal Arts Model of Medical Education: Its Importance and Limitations |
Laurence B. Mccullough |
|
Abstract
|
| 10 |
“The More Things Change...”: Clouser on Bioethics in Medical Education |
John C. Moskop |
|
Abstract
In this paper, I have sought to highlight the pioneering contributions made by Dan Clouser to the emerging field of bioethics. Building on Clouser’s advice, I have also offered additional suggestions regarding the methods and core content of bioethics instruction in medical schools. Due in no small measure to Clouser’s work, I am confident that bioethics will continue to evolve and expand into the twenty-first century and beyond.
|
| 11 |
Contract and the Critique of Principlism: Hypothetical Contract as Epistemological Theory and as Met |
Robert M. Veatch |
|
Abstract
Danner Clouser’s contributions as friend, teacher, and moral theorist have been remarkable. That one who is self-admittedly more comfortable as a teacher of medical students and as an enabler of the scholarship of others should also have provided the stimulus for such a profound theory of morality is quite remarkable. Surely, the attempt to articulate and systematize the common morality is, and continues to be, a terribly important and worthwhile project. His continual warning against principles divorced from theory needs to be taken seriously. We are in the process of doing that. I see that need in two separate tasks: the development of metaethical theory for testing the common morality (for which hypothetical contact theory seems to me to hold great promise) and the development of normative theory that properly subordinates beneficence and nonmaleficence. In contrast with some balancing principlists, Clouser’s insistence on separating out beneficence — the notion of doing good — so that it is not on a par with other moral considerations is definitely on the right track..Exactly,how one comes out on these issues in normative ethical theory,one has to acknowledge how provocative th
|
| 12 |
Morality and Its Applications |
Bernard Gert,Danner Clouser |
|
Abstract
|
| 13 |
Concerning Principlism and Its Defenders: Reply to Beauchamp and Veatch |
K. Danner Clouser,Bernard Gert |
|
Abstract
|
| 14 |
Responses to Callahan, Dubler, Engelhardt, Jonsen, Kopelman, Mccullough, and Moskop |
K. Danner Clouser |
|
Abstract
|
| 15 |
Response to all the Contibutors |
K. Danner Clouser |
|
Abstract
|
| 16 |
Back Matter |
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|
派博传思国际
( 京公网安备110108008328)
GMT+8, 2025-7-12 01:23
发表于 2025-3-21 16:16:55
