找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Broken Agile; Second Edition Tim Brizard Book 2015Latest edition Tim Brizard 2015 agile.software.development.programmer.scrum.essays.Java..

[复制链接]
查看: 13325|回复: 61
发表于 2025-3-21 17:25:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Broken Agile
期刊简称Second Edition
影响因子2023Tim Brizard
视频video
发行地址A unique book of essays on the positives and negatives of agile software development.Agile software development continues to be at the forefront of methodologies for today‘s software developers.Tim Br
图书封面Titlebook: Broken Agile; Second Edition Tim Brizard Book 2015Latest edition Tim Brizard 2015 agile.software.development.programmer.scrum.essays.Java..
影响因子.Learn how to be successful in adopting Agile and see good and bad examples of how Agile can be adopted. .Broken Agile, Second Edition. contains stories from years of real world experience on Agile teams and projects. The stories in each chapter are both educational and entertaining. Each chapter focuses on specific Agile values and principles. The stories in each chapter are used to illustrate how Agile values and principles are sometimes misunderstood or misapplied on Agile teams and projects. You will read how Agile is used in the real world and the consequences of poor adaptations of the Agile software development methodology. These stories will help you in your journey to adopt Agile software development..What You‘ll Learn..What are goodand bad examples of how Agile can be adopted..What are somespecific Agile values and principles..How some ofthese are misunderstood or misapplied..How Agile isused in the real world ..What are theconsequences of poor adoption of the Agile software methodology..How somecompanies have been successful in adopting Agile. .Audience.This book is for experienced software developers in their journey to adopt Agile Software development. It is very usefu
Pindex Book 2015Latest edition
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Broken Agile影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Broken Agile影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Broken Agile网络公开度




书目名称Broken Agile网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Broken Agile被引频次




书目名称Broken Agile被引频次学科排名




书目名称Broken Agile年度引用




书目名称Broken Agile年度引用学科排名




书目名称Broken Agile读者反馈




书目名称Broken Agile读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:17:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 04:07:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:09:40 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8005-2at are trying to adopt the Agile software development methodology, successfully scaling presents some unique challenges. Often scaling too quickly leads to problems that people blame on Agile. In reality, the problems could have been avoided, or at least mitigated, if more upfront planning had been
发表于 2025-3-22 12:31:01 | 显示全部楼层
Zusammenfassung und Implikationen,ing kept in the loop? Furthermore, how do you ensure that the cross-functional team members on an Agile team are collaborating in a way that is productive? Finally, how do you make sure that “communication overload” does not happen (too many e-mails, etc.)? This is not always easy to achieve; it may
发表于 2025-3-22 13:47:34 | 显示全部楼层
Zusammenfassung und Implikationen,knowing exactly what is needed in the long run? Furthermore, how do you front load a project with all the foundational-type work (think continuous integration, frameworks, etc.) that will make the rest of the project go smoothly? Once you think you know what those things are, how do you convince man
发表于 2025-3-22 19:58:19 | 显示全部楼层
Zusammenfassung und Implikationen,ntality from setting in. I can’t even count how many times I’ve heard that phrase. I’ve heard so many developers use the “I wasn’t involved in that decision, so I’m just going to follow what they did” excuse instead of refactoring a bad piece of code. This doesn’t fall into a single clean Agile cate
发表于 2025-3-22 21:44:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:08:22 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8005-2the wrong signals to teams—signals that are confusing and contradict what people have learned about Agile on their own or at other companies? Sending the wrong signals can lead to a lot of confusion and can create poor morale among teams. Poor morale can then lead to poor-quality software and spendi
发表于 2025-3-23 08:39:41 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-28 06:09
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表