找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style; Jeremy Richardson Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho

[复制链接]
查看: 28747|回复: 36
发表于 2025-3-21 19:21:18 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style
影响因子2023Jeremy Richardson
视频video
发行地址Re-defines the concept of ‘policy style‘ and engages with the debate to characterise a British policy style.Explores trends and shifts in this style up to the current day.Demonstrates the need for a p
图书封面Titlebook: British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style;  Jeremy Richardson Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho
影响因子This book revisits and re-defines the policy style concept and explores the long-standing debate in British political science concerning how best to characterise the British policy style. The book highlights several trends that suggest that the British policy style has shifted towards the impositional end of the policy style spectrum, bringing it more in line with the traditional Westminster model of governing. However, these changes also reflect a more frenetic policy style which might increase the number of policy blunders and failures in British Government unless means are found to access and manage the specialist expertise that interest groups possess.
Pindex Book 2018
The information of publication is updating

书目名称British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style影响因子(影响力)




书目名称British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style网络公开度




书目名称British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style网络公开度学科排名




书目名称British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style被引频次




书目名称British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style被引频次学科排名




书目名称British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style年度引用




书目名称British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style年度引用学科排名




书目名称British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style读者反馈




书目名称British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:56:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:17:12 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction: The Concept of Policy Style,andard operating procedures’. These changes are best characterised as a more . approach to policy-making, with a consequent reduction in the power and influence of interest groups and a general reduction in consensus, and even less anticipatory policy-making, with a shift towards a more . policy style.
发表于 2025-3-22 05:35:53 | 显示全部楼层
ster model of governing. However, these changes also reflect a more frenetic policy style which might increase the number of policy blunders and failures in British Government unless means are found to access and manage the specialist expertise that interest groups possess.978-3-319-90029-2
发表于 2025-3-22 11:36:00 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9708-1ce, corporatist and neo-corporatist arrangement appears to have been significantly eroded, even in countries where these arrangements were thought to be embedded. In short, there is much more government and much less governance.
发表于 2025-3-22 14:32:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:49:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:07:53 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2018haracterise the British policy style. The book highlights several trends that suggest that the British policy style has shifted towards the impositional end of the policy style spectrum, bringing it more in line with the traditional Westminster model of governing. However, these changes also reflect
发表于 2025-3-23 04:32:41 | 显示全部楼层
Government Without Governance: A Difficult and Risky Business?,lt of lack of proper consultation and deliberation. A means has to be found to avoid excessive interest group influence, which can lead to reform deficits, whilst mobilising the expertise which interest groups possess.
发表于 2025-3-23 08:16:21 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2018 a more frenetic policy style which might increase the number of policy blunders and failures in British Government unless means are found to access and manage the specialist expertise that interest groups possess.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-30 22:56
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表