找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate; Journalists Reportin Binakuromo Ogbebor Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable)

[复制链接]
楼主: 脸红
发表于 2025-3-28 17:01:32 | 显示全部楼层
Linking Historical and Maritime Archaeology,the UK as a way of highlighting recurrent trends in efforts at reforming press regulation and the outcomes of such attempts. To this end, this chapter discusses the history of press regulation in Britain, the British press system (introducing the three major newspaper classifications—broadsheets, mi
发表于 2025-3-28 19:49:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 23:35:21 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33600-1the . phone hacking scandal and the Leveson Inquiry. A total of 870 news articles on the media reform debate from six British national newspapers were examined. Based on her findings, the author argues that the public needs to play a greater and more pragmatic role in ensuring press accountability.
发表于 2025-3-29 06:14:43 | 显示全部楼层
Linking Historical and Maritime Archaeology, to efforts by the press to protect news paradigms rather than critically examining them to see if there is a need for change (Bennet et al. 1985, cited in Carlson, Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: Definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. .(4), 349–368, 2015,
发表于 2025-3-29 10:31:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 13:09:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 17:01:56 | 显示全部楼层
Models of Container Port Security,y. Using content analysis, critical discourse analysis and a theoretical framework that consists of the public sphere concept and the gatekeeping theory, this chapter reveals that the coverage of the press reform debate was characterised by a doubly narrow spectrum of sources. It also found that the
发表于 2025-3-29 23:19:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 02:02:07 | 显示全部楼层
,Größenentwicklung der Containerschiffe,n serve as a democratic public sphere where diverse voices can have proportionate access to the press reform debate, the media used their gatekeeping powers to advance their views while limiting or preventing arguments that were against their self-interest from gaining entrance into the public spher
发表于 2025-3-30 07:27:17 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37265-1Leveson Inquiry; News of the World; Phone hacking; Phone hacking scandal; Media policy; Media and democra
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-7 15:23
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表