找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility; Writing, Sentiment a Brycchan Carey Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmi

[复制链接]
查看: 18200|回复: 40
发表于 2025-3-21 17:04:45 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility
期刊简称Writing, Sentiment a
影响因子2023Brycchan Carey
视频video
学科分类Palgrave Studies in the Enlightenment, Romanticism and Cultures of Print
图书封面Titlebook: British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility; Writing, Sentiment a Brycchan Carey Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmi
影响因子British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility argues that participants in the late eighteenth-century slavery debate developed a distinct sentimental rhetoric, using the language of the heart to powerful effect in the most important political and humanitarian battle of the time. Examining both familiar and unfamiliar texts, including poetry, novels, journalism, and political writing, Carey shows that salve-owners and abolitionists alike made strategic use of the rhetoric of sensibility in the hope of influencing a reading public thoroughly immersed in the ‘cult of feeling‘.
Pindex Book 2005
The information of publication is updating

书目名称British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility影响因子(影响力)




书目名称British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility网络公开度




书目名称British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility网络公开度学科排名




书目名称British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility被引频次




书目名称British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility被引频次学科排名




书目名称British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility年度引用




书目名称British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility年度引用学科排名




书目名称British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility读者反馈




书目名称British Abolitionism and the Rhetoric of Sensibility读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:07:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 04:28:25 | 显示全部楼层
Arguing in Prose: Abolitionist Letters and Novels, diversion, argument, and parables, both denounced false sensibility, and both made use of the emotional subversion of the intellect. Where they differed was in their details: literary sentimental rhetoric was predominantly fictional while political rhetoric at least purported to be factual. They ag
发表于 2025-3-22 05:14:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:18:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:26:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:32:07 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2005h familiar and unfamiliar texts, including poetry, novels, journalism, and political writing, Carey shows that salve-owners and abolitionists alike made strategic use of the rhetoric of sensibility in the hope of influencing a reading public thoroughly immersed in the ‘cult of feeling‘.
发表于 2025-3-22 22:14:05 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:29:42 | 显示全部楼层
2634-6516 s alike made strategic use of the rhetoric of sensibility in the hope of influencing a reading public thoroughly immersed in the ‘cult of feeling‘.978-1-349-52349-8978-0-230-50162-1Series ISSN 2634-6516 Series E-ISSN 2634-6524
发表于 2025-3-23 05:41:27 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-29 04:04
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表