找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Britain and the Mine, 1900–1915; Culture, Strategy an Richard Dunley Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 First W

[复制链接]
楼主: Falter
发表于 2025-3-25 06:04:15 | 显示全部楼层
,Development and Institutionalisation: Offensive Mining 1906–1909,trategic circumstances changed and how the attempts to keep British mining developments secret impacted on the influence of the technology. It goes on to show how the gradual lifting of this veil of secrecy allowed mining to become institutionalised within the fleet.
发表于 2025-3-25 10:25:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 13:15:03 | 显示全部楼层
The Test of Conflict, Liberal government in response to failures of economic warfare, in the face of strong cultural opposition from within the Royal Navy. Following the return of Lord Fisher to the Admiralty mining was once again at the heart of British naval strategy and in May 1915 Fisher was pursuing his ‘Baltic Pro
发表于 2025-3-25 19:45:05 | 显示全部楼层
War, Law and Diplomacy,nelaying was seen in Britain as a breach of basic norms of warfare, and was the justification for retaliatory British measures to restrict neutral use of the seas. This escalatory spiral soon resulted in the German use of submarines against merchant vessels, with its resultant impact on diplomatic r
发表于 2025-3-25 21:07:31 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion,the nature of warfare. It explores why mining represented such a contested issue in Britain in the decade following its emergence as a technology in the Russo-Japanese War, and how changing perceptions of what was acceptable in conflict meant it lost this place in the spring of 1915.
发表于 2025-3-26 02:07:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 05:56:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 09:27:42 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6137-0this in greater detail. It highlights how the technology itself was a key weapon in the First World War at sea, but beyond this, how the contested views over the weapon meant that it lay at the centre of overlapping issues of strategy, culture and international law.
发表于 2025-3-26 13:31:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 16:55:13 | 显示全部楼层
Ellen K. Longmire,Steven L. Andersonjects to be discussed there. Through exploring firstly why Britain attempted to ban mines at The Hague and secondly, why those attempts failed, it is possible to see how the competing issues of international law and military necessity interacted in this period.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-28 19:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表