Titlebook: Boundaries Crossed, at the Interfaces of Morphosyntax, Phonology, Pragmatics and Semantics; Huba Bartos,Marcel den Dikken,Tamás Váradi Boo

尊重

Possessive Agreement Turned into a Derivational Suffixffix; it cross-referenced a pro-dropped 3PL possessor on a possessum consisting of a determiner or modifier and an ellipted nominal (pro. .-.-. ʻevery one of them’). Owing to its covertness, the pro possessor came to be ignored, and the -.-marked elliptical expression, originally expressing a subset

Ovulation

Hybrid Categories and the CITtral idea is that syntactic representations should be thought of in terms of monovalued syntactic features and a multi-tiered arrangement of these features in ways that are close in spirit to Element Theory as developed for phonology in the 1980 s.

indignant

Evidence for Generalized Verbal Periphrasis in Englishbetween . (past) and . (present perfect) cannot find its source in the absence versus presence of ., which itself does not contribute to the meaning difference. Rather, à la Iatridou et al. (.), I develop the idea that interpretive differences must be found in the different functional/adverbial proj

NATAL

Marking Finiteness and Low Peripheries to lowering from C) since it is able to capture the relatedness between -. and finiteness: -. is specified as [fin] and while the FP may be generated to host focussed constituents (including .-elements) in non-finite clauses, a lexically [fin] head cannot be inserted.

Delirium

侵蚀

Focus in Focusd approaches to information structure in discourse-configurational languages. It is also shown based on a careful examination of the interpretation of the construction that the exhaustivity of focus and the existential inference associated with its background, two interpretive properties that are of

flavonoids

填料

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3676-6volves a switch from the impaired subsystem to the unimpaired or less impaired subsystem. The other aphasic group involved Broca’s and conduction aphasics. They reacted to tasks requiring lexical recursion by the strategy of .: they preferred the use of very simplex synonyms or hyperonyms to constru

grudging

jocular

Linda D. Chrosniak,John H. Riskindffix; it cross-referenced a pro-dropped 3PL possessor on a possessum consisting of a determiner or modifier and an ellipted nominal (pro. .-.-. ʻevery one of them’). Owing to its covertness, the pro possessor came to be ignored, and the -.-marked elliptical expression, originally expressing a subset