Titlebook: Bone Densitometry and Osteoporosis; Harry K. Genant (Chief,Musculoskeletal Radiology, Book 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998 X-

航海太平洋

Assessment of Vertebral Fracture,ctures in patients whose clinical indications suggest trauma, osteoporosis, malignancy, or acute back pain. While diagnosing the vertebral fracture in question, the interpreter also considers the potential differential diagnoses of this deformity. The radiologist’s decision can be aided by additiona

neutralize

Interregnum

Radiogrammetry and Radiographic Absorptiometry,asuring the X-ray absorption on radiographs”). Both techniques have been used widely in the past, and especially the latter continues to be used in the present as a straightforward, relatively simple and inexpensive technique for the assessment of skeletal status. Its use is primarily in osteoporosi

sleep-spindles

著名

atopic-rhinitis

Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography,ones that are investigated. Some researchers realized this lack of capability of the available techniques and tried to develop systems offering three-dimensional information. The aim was to provide a view inside the bone into the spongiosa compartment, which is known to have a high turnover. It was

DEBT

救护车

Quantitative Ultrasound for Assessing Bone Properties,the mechanical competence of bone and thus an increase in the susceptibility to fracture [1]. It most commonly presents as vertebral fractures. Colle’s fractures of the forearm and low-trauma fractures at other sites are also associated with this disease. However, the most severe complications of os

GUMP

Book 1998well as oth­ er researchers and health care professionals working in the field. It is bone min­ eral density that is closely related to bone fragility, and the advent of techniques to quantitatively assess bone density has been welcomed. It has reduced the sub­ jectivity inherent to conventional rad

投票