Titlebook: Blockbuster Performances; How Actors Contribut Daniel Smith-Rowsey Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 stars.pop

行业

冲突

Duodenitis

bromide

血统

Palgrave Studies in Screen Industries and Performancehttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/189172.jpg

等级的上升

,Rééducation des prothèses totales du genou, blockbuster films. Formal strategies of blockbusters—for example, green screens, kinetic action, rapid-fire editing—are thought to result in “artificial” or “cartoonish” performances, but here the author counters that the acting in influential big-budget films is better and more appropriate than it

ironic

https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-33001-1 of the initial blockbuster cycle (of the 1950s and 1960s) because of what were often considered “ham-fisted,” “declamatory,” “histrionic,” or simply “bad” performances. Prompted by Vivian Sobchack’s famous essay about “surge and splendor” in the historical epic, Smith-Rowsey asks if audiences want

Minuet

https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-33001-1this change was led by strong, believable performances. Smith-Rowsey explains how the excellent acting in the first three live-action . films both elaborated those films’ themes and, along with the initial films of WB’s . franchise, transformed possibilities for blockbusters. In response, Disney mou

环形

https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-33001-1nt superhero films . (2008) and . (2008). The author’s argument builds upon the timeline established in Chaps. . and ., whereby so-called “character acting” in lead performances in blockbusters became steadily more desirable than “star acting,” situating . and . as culminations and accelerations of

征服