Titlebook: Blake 2.0; William Blake in Twe Steve Clark (Visiting Professor),Tristanne Connoll Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Pu

喝水

书目名称Blake 2.0影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Blake 2.0影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Blake 2.0网络公开度




书目名称Blake 2.0网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Blake 2.0被引频次




书目名称Blake 2.0被引频次学科排名




书目名称Blake 2.0年度引用




书目名称Blake 2.0年度引用学科排名




书目名称Blake 2.0读者反馈




书目名称Blake 2.0读者反馈学科排名

提名的名单

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05436-6n Huston such as . (1951) — to see such critical re-evaluations of specific genres, such as the western, from the 1950s onwards, with movies from the period of the Korean war being increasingly infused with Cold War anxieties (de Bona 57–8).

死亡

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05436-6en word piece, ., Moore follows Blake on a spiritual journey, ‘out of light and into history’, and references to Blake, the four-fold city, and Jerusalem also appear in an earlier performance, .. A pictorial biography of Blake will feature in the forthcoming ..

Coma704

欲望

突袭

不给啤

e. This volume takes Blake 2.0 as an interactive concept, examining digital dissemination of his works and reinvention by artists, writers, musicians, and filmmakers across a variety of twentieth-century media.978-0-230-36668-8

magnate

Vicki Harman,Benedetta Cappellinilegacy in their art or literature, Blake scholars have been more reluctant to admit the same, or even to recognize any affinities whatsoever between Blake and Surrealism.. In view of this discrepancy, this chapter aims to trace the Surrealists’ use of Blake’s art, and Surrealism’s oddly neglected yet long-lasting counter-impact on Blake studies.

–FER

arcane

Leisure and the Informal Economyst, Blake’ (. 322). But why Blake? And why the 1960s and 1970s? Given his modest early reputation, why should Blake, more than 130 years after his death, become so prominent in the popular imagination that he was able to rub shoulders with Lao-tse, Christ, Marx, and indeed a host of other luminaries?