找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law; Ulrich Storz,Martin Quodbach,Matthew Parker Book 2014 The Author(s) 2014 America Invents Act.Eu

[复制链接]
查看: 7289|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 17:40:13 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law
影响因子2023Ulrich Storz,Martin Quodbach,Matthew Parker
视频video
发行地址Addresses currently debated issues concerning biotechnological inventions.Written by internationally active experts.Provides a basis for understanding biotech patentability.Includes supplementary mate
学科分类SpringerBriefs in Biotech Patents
图书封面Titlebook: Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law;  Ulrich Storz,Martin Quodbach,Matthew Parker Book 2014 The Author(s) 2014 America Invents Act.Eu
影响因子.SpringerBriefs in Biotech Patents. presents timely reports on intellectual properties (IP) issues and patent aspects in the field of biotechnology. This volume focus on particular aspects of the US patent law, which can have tremendous differences compared to the European law. This includes questions of biopatent prosecution, novelty, inventive step, written disclosure and sufficiency of enablement as well as questions of law enforcement of biotech patents..
Pindex Book 2014
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law网络公开度




书目名称Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law被引频次




书目名称Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law被引频次学科排名




书目名称Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law年度引用




书目名称Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law年度引用学科排名




书目名称Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law读者反馈




书目名称Biopatent Law: European vs. US Patent Law读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:14:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 04:22:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:27:58 | 显示全部楼层
SpringerBriefs in Biotech Patentshttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/188307.jpg
发表于 2025-3-22 08:43:41 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0378-8A contribution to the litigation of patents in Europe with special references to biotechnological inventions and to the practice according to the German system of patent enforcement.
发表于 2025-3-22 16:46:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:02:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:46:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:27:16 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41293-6America Invents Act; European Patent Convention; Medical use claims; Patent litigation; Therapeutic comp
发表于 2025-3-23 07:55:36 | 显示全部楼层
Patentability Requirements of Biotech Patents,itten description, best mode, and sufficiency of disclosure. Differences between Europe and the United States are highlighted, and practical implications are discussed with respect to the biopatent field.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-29 15:47
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表