找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Bioethics Critically Reconsidered; Having Second Though H. Tristram Engelhardt Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Autonomy

[复制链接]
查看: 13849|回复: 43
发表于 2025-3-21 19:47:36 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Bioethics Critically Reconsidered
期刊简称Having Second Though
影响因子2023H. Tristram Engelhardt
视频video
发行地址Focuses on the role of social/political ideology in the development of bioethics.Has as its focus a retrospective on the ideological foundations of bioethics as a discipline.Offers a variety of perspe
图书封面Titlebook: Bioethics Critically Reconsidered; Having Second Though H. Tristram Engelhardt Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Autonomy
影响因子.Bioethics developed as an academic and clinical discipline during the later part of the 20th century due to a variety of factors. Crucial to this development was the increased secularization of American culture as well as the dissolution of medicine as a quasi-guild with its own professional ethics. In the context of this moral vacuum, bioethics came into existence. Its raison d’être was opposition to the alleged paternalism of the medical community and traditional moral frameworks, yet at the same time it set itself up as a source of moral authority with respect to biomedical decision making. Bioethics serves as biopolitics in so far as it attempts to make determinations about how individuals ought to make medical decisions and then attempts to codify that in law. Progressivism and secularism are ultimately the ideology of bioethics..
Pindex Book 2012
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Bioethics Critically Reconsidered影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Bioethics Critically Reconsidered影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Bioethics Critically Reconsidered网络公开度




书目名称Bioethics Critically Reconsidered网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Bioethics Critically Reconsidered被引频次




书目名称Bioethics Critically Reconsidered被引频次学科排名




书目名称Bioethics Critically Reconsidered年度引用




书目名称Bioethics Critically Reconsidered年度引用学科排名




书目名称Bioethics Critically Reconsidered读者反馈




书目名称Bioethics Critically Reconsidered读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:56:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 00:44:08 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2012. Bioethics serves as biopolitics in so far as it attempts to make determinations about how individuals ought to make medical decisions and then attempts to codify that in law. Progressivism and secularism are ultimately the ideology of bioethics..
发表于 2025-3-22 05:25:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:34:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:59:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:46:17 | 显示全部楼层
Why Clinical Bioethics So Rarely Gives Morally Normative Guidancecs committees or bioethics consultants (health care ethics consultants). Bioethics and the presence of clinical ethicists have become part of the everyday lifeworld of not just the United States, but of much of Europe, the Pacific Rim, and elsewhere. In some forty years, bioethics has come to command a significant cultural and social authority.
发表于 2025-3-22 23:42:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:27:07 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2012elopment was the increased secularization of American culture as well as the dissolution of medicine as a quasi-guild with its own professional ethics. In the context of this moral vacuum, bioethics came into existence. Its raison d’être was opposition to the alleged paternalism of the medical commu
发表于 2025-3-23 09:14:28 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-7-2 03:59
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表