Titlebook: Bioethical Controversies in Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery; Constantine Mavroudis,J. Thomas Cook,Constantine D Book 2020 Springe

无所不知

潜移默化

https://doi.org/10.1007/3-8350-5719-7nplace in pediatric cardiac care centers. Specifically, the problematic notion of having a diagnosis with an unclear natural history in utero that may lead to critical illness postnatally and that may warrant fetal intervention to prevent such postnatal illness is discussed within the framework of m

贿赂

我悲伤

https://doi.org/10.1007/3-8350-5719-7who include: the mother, the father, the obstetrician, the pediatric cardiologist, the pediatric cardiac surgeon, and many others. It is the duty of the physician to administer and perform informed consent under high risk pre- and postnatal circumstances that require high risk surgical options witho

Congeal

https://doi.org/10.1007/3-8350-5719-7 clinicians and families to provide guidance about ethical issues that arise during medical treatment. Ethicists may help to resolve disputes when parties disagree about treatment decisions, offer historical context regarding issues that medical providers and families may think are novel, and provid

progestogen

致词

https://doi.org/10.1007/3-8350-5719-7 controversy. This moral maze, already difficult to navigate, has become even more hazardous with the addition of a new dragon which has arisen out of the pitfalls of transparency. Better and more complete data collection in cardiology and cardiac surgery generally has led to increasingly clamorous

Leisureliness

incite

CRAMP