Titlebook: Beyond the Steady State; A Revival of Growth Joseph Halevi,David Laibman,Edward J. Nell Book 1992 Joseph Halevi, David Laibman and Edward

Synchronism

学术讨论会

frugal

owth process, rather than treating it as an afterthought, a complicating factor to be introduced without disturbing the conclusions already derived; moreover, we will seek a thorough account of the endogenous determination of technical change within specific kinds of economic structures.

受辱

t that the evolution of new techniques and products was intimately related to the process of competition. According to them the competitive process leads to a selection of new techniques and an extinction of old techniques. Moreover, new products may arise in the evolution of the market system and old products vanish.

漫不经心

Ingest

Flu表流动

Optimal Choice of Technique and Biased Technical Change: From the Steady State to the Consistent Patowth process, rather than treating it as an afterthought, a complicating factor to be introduced without disturbing the conclusions already derived; moreover, we will seek a thorough account of the endogenous determination of technical change within specific kinds of economic structures.

Hemiplegia

Classical Competitive Dynamics and Technical Changet that the evolution of new techniques and products was intimately related to the process of competition. According to them the competitive process leads to a selection of new techniques and an extinction of old techniques. Moreover, new products may arise in the evolution of the market system and old products vanish.

inundate

Traverse Analysis in a Post-Classical Model center of the stage. The decisive problem that the economy confronts upon departing from a golden-age growth path is the inadequacy of the old capital stock facing the new constellation of data. The necessary . requires both . and ., and faces difficulties which arise from disproportions between sectors and misleading market signals.

fidelity

e direct and indirect labor embodied in a good . the employment multiplier for that good, and the set of labor values for the economy as a whole is the matrix employment multiplier for the economy. Why, when they developed the theory of labor values, did Ricardo and Marx not take the further step of defining the employment multiplier?