找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Beyond Reason; Essays on the Philos Gonzalo Munévar Book 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1991 Galileo Galilei.Paul Feyeraben

[复制链接]
查看: 34071|回复: 60
发表于 2025-3-21 17:33:16 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Beyond Reason
期刊简称Essays on the Philos
影响因子2023Gonzalo Munévar
视频video
学科分类Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
图书封面Titlebook: Beyond Reason; Essays on the Philos Gonzalo Munévar Book 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1991 Galileo Galilei.Paul Feyeraben
影响因子Some philosophers think that Paul Feyerabend is a clown, a great many others think that he is one of the most exciting philosophers of science of this century. For me the truth does not lie somewhere in between, for I am decidedly of the second opinion, an opinion that is becoming general around the world as this century comes to an end and history begins to cast its appraising eye upon the intellectual harvest of our era. A good example of this opinion may be found in the admiration for Feyerabend‘s philosophy of science expressed by Grover Maxwell in his contribution to this volume. Maxwell, recalling his own intellectual transformation, says also that it was Feyerabend who "confirmed my then incipient suspicions that most of the foundations of currently fashionable philosophy and even a great deal of the methodology to which many scientists pay enthusiastic lip service are based on simple mistake- assumptions whose absurdity becomes obvious once attention is directed at them". And lest the reader thinks, as many still do, that however sharp Feyerabend‘s attacks upon the philosophical establishment may have been, he does not offer a positive philosophy (a complain made by C.A. Ho
Pindex Book 1991
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Beyond Reason影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Beyond Reason影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Beyond Reason网络公开度




书目名称Beyond Reason网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Beyond Reason被引频次




书目名称Beyond Reason被引频次学科排名




书目名称Beyond Reason年度引用




书目名称Beyond Reason年度引用学科排名




书目名称Beyond Reason读者反馈




书目名称Beyond Reason读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:16:44 | 显示全部楼层
The Function of the Clearing House with a proper theory of brain function. Not even the most optimistic of us, however, expected this to happen in less than fifty years, and most would have guessed a great deal longer. And yet the time has arrived. Experimental neuroscience has revealed enough of the brain’s microphysical organizati
发表于 2025-3-22 00:40:58 | 显示全部楼层
International Securities Lendingre available to us, limited only by our ingenuity, or by canons of consistency, or relevance, or simplicity, or beauty, or utility, essentialism would have little claim on us, if it were not for the conviction (or prejudice or instinct) that there is one . way to represent it, namely the way it real
发表于 2025-3-22 08:00:16 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:12:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:55:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:43:29 | 显示全部楼层
Bibi van den Berg,Pauline Hutten,Ruth Prinsaration of science and state, just as there is a separation of church and state. This should be so because (1) science is only one of many traditions or ideologies, (2) a free society is one in which there is equality among traditions or ideologies, and (3) society’s preferred treatment of science i
发表于 2025-3-22 21:25:00 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42523-4 children of witches from being burned at the stake. ‘Now these children are damned to eternal agony in hell’, so he reproached himself, ‘because of my short-sighted sentiments’. Have we ever asked ourselves if the step to strictly secular civilization might have similar consequences?”
发表于 2025-3-23 03:58:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:23:48 | 显示全部楼层
International Security Yearbook 1983/84scribed characteristics of investigators, such as their race, nationality, sex, religion or class, should never enter into the evaluation of scientific research. Few scientists or philosophers, then or now, would disagree. Who does not deplore the Nazi diatribes against “Jewish physics” or Stalinist
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-30 12:16
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表