找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Beyond Legitimation; Essays on the Proble Donald Wiebe Book 1994 Donald Wiebe 1994 Immanuel Kant.philosophy of religion.religion.religious

[复制链接]
楼主: GLAZE
发表于 2025-3-23 11:44:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 17:44:29 | 显示全部楼层
Comprehensiveness: The Integrity of Anglican Theologyn fifteen years ago Ninian Smart, from whom the above epigraph derives, felt compelled to draw attention to ‘the intellectual crisis of British Christianity which, oddly it seems, thrives unnoticed’.. Indeed, he found the entire situation ‘shocking and ludicrous’and so to require the ‘promotion of a
发表于 2025-3-23 19:07:19 | 显示全部楼层
The Ambiguous Revolution: Kant on the Nature of Faithle, Kant’s theology diverges radically from tradition.. While rejecting the traditional proofs as a foundation for a knowledge of God (God’s existence, etc.) as wholly inadequate, he nevertheless remained a theist. Unwilling to believe in God in the absence of good reasons for doing so, however, he
发表于 2025-3-23 22:23:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 06:09:33 | 显示全部楼层
An Unholy Alliance? The Creationists’ Quest for Scientific Legitimation given our present state of knowledge it must be taken as being beyond reasonable doubt. This is not to say that in its present form it provides us with a wholly adequate account and explanation of all biological phenomena.. Hardly anyone, especially biologists and philosophers of biology, would wan
发表于 2025-3-24 07:54:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 11:41:46 | 显示全部楼层
Has Philosophy of Religion a Place in the Agenda of Theology?logy are in themselves is not at all clear — all three being hotly contested notions on which agreement is seldom achieved and never widespread. I shall, nevertheless, attempt an answer to the question, despite the difficulties, proceeding on the basis of provisional characterizations of its three central concepts.
发表于 2025-3-24 17:23:54 | 显示全部楼层
Book 1994ience relationship that does not assume they must be compatible. That examination, in the final analysis, reveals a fundamental contradiction in the compatibility system building programme which more than suggests that religious belief (knowledge) is beyond legitimation.
发表于 2025-3-24 21:21:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 01:43:08 | 显示全部楼层
Jo Inge Bekkevold,Geoffrey Tilllogy are in themselves is not at all clear — all three being hotly contested notions on which agreement is seldom achieved and never widespread. I shall, nevertheless, attempt an answer to the question, despite the difficulties, proceeding on the basis of provisional characterizations of its three central concepts.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-26 09:41
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表