找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Beyond Legal Positivism; The Moral Authority Whitley R. P. Kaufman Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclus

[复制链接]
楼主: 机会
发表于 2025-3-25 04:29:08 | 显示全部楼层
OPEC in the Age of Climate Change,t doctrines as normative, we can engage in a genuine debate about the ideals that a legal system should pursue, instead of the current situation in which legal positivists present their normative preferences in the forms of necessary conceptual truths.
发表于 2025-3-25 10:57:15 | 显示全部楼层
Normative Legal Positivism,t doctrines as normative, we can engage in a genuine debate about the ideals that a legal system should pursue, instead of the current situation in which legal positivists present their normative preferences in the forms of necessary conceptual truths.
发表于 2025-3-25 12:18:32 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2023been that there is no necessary connection between law and morality. This book provides a broad but clear and jargon-free account of the central objections to the theory and why those objections are sufficient to show that legal positivism is no longer tenable. This includes a broad critique of the
发表于 2025-3-25 19:39:02 | 显示全部楼层
The Function of Law,way to explain and understand a human artifact like law is not in terms of ‘essences’ or necessary properties but in terms of its purpose. The aim of law is to establish a single, comprehensive moral code with which a society can organize itself.
发表于 2025-3-25 21:29:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 03:00:07 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2023ool arises from a caricatured account of that doctrine, for instance the idea that it requires substantive theological commitments or particular conceptions of human nature. In contrast, the author presents an account of natural law theory that is grounded in a commitment to moral truth, but not to
发表于 2025-3-26 06:05:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 11:51:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 14:14:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 20:47:40 | 显示全部楼层
The Problem of Legal Authority, law and morality, whether that be expressed through the Separability Thesis or the Social Fact Thesis (that law is a matter of social fact, not moral truth). We show how this doctrine is the fatal weakness of legal positivism, for it renders the theory unable to explain the concept of legal obligat
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-30 20:28
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表