Titlebook: Between Theory and Practice: Essays on Criticism and Crises of Democracy; Eerik Lagerspetz,Oili Pulkkinen Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if appl

无弹性

Instinctive

,E- Procurement — elektronische Beschaffung,t becomes that populism cannot be accommodated within it. In short, the theory of democracy has a key role in the differing normative conclusions that various authors draw from their accounts of populism. The central contribution of this chapter is to make explicit the breadth of the theoretical com

杀菌剂

,Lösungshinweise zu den Fragen,zing control of the media, undermining the rule of law, or mobilizing state resources for campaigning. Authoritarian actors can also improve their chances with technical decisions: enacting voter suppression, redrawing district boundaries, or changing electoral rules, for instance. However, more bla

intimate

,Lösungshinweise zu den Fragen,ions and obstructing the opposing groups. This phenomenon can be seen as a by-product of strong enough political power, and ultimately authoritarianism is not the only rival of liberal democracy, but democracy itself.

Neuropeptides

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9847-7 believe that the exceptional can be subjected to normative regulation. For decisionists, any attempt to regulate the exceptional is doomed to fail for conceptual reasons. A third possibility is to stick to the constitutional rules and accept the consequences, for law simply cannot authorize its own

aqueduct

有节制

subacute

释放

弯腰

The Trust in Science Revisited: Social-Epistemic Challenges in Democratic and Digital Societiest empower laymen in identifying trustworthy experts; (c) a stable ‘veritistic equilibrium’ in trust-networks that ensures a ‘truth-conserving’ distribution of knowledge; (d) the resilience of trustworthy science in the digital world, where it is endangered most. The results of this analysis can, in