Titlebook: Believers, Skeptics, and Failure in Conflict Resolution; Ian S. Spears Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under ex

在前面

Perspectives on Conflict Resolution, the contrasting—even contradictory—assumptions about the means by which conflict should be understood and remedied. The lack of consensus says that not only experts and practitioners do not sufficiently understand their subject matter but that they are unable to conceptualize complexity in ways that will produce peace.

Interlocking

STERN

ocative and critical response to the literature that suggest.This book discusses the following questions: Why are some conflicts so enduring and why is conflict resolution so hard? The author begins by introducing two conflicting perspectives, Skeptics and Believers, to highlight the lack of consens

使显得不重要

calumniate

教唆

Sources of Violent Conflict and the Banality of Conflict Resolution, conflict resolution within that literature. The chapter argues that much of this literature is .; it introduces purportedly new sources of conflict but continues to reproduce the same approaches to resolution that have always been advocated.

沉着

States, Leaders, Governance, and Why Conflict Resolution Fails, West. I outline four elements that Western experts advocate in terms of state-building in former colonial states, compare these ideas with the manner in which Western states themselves developed, and explain why current methods and approaches are so problematic in the contemporary developing world.

Interregnum

Book 2019 demonstrates the ways in which the nature of the state contributes to violent conflict. In the end, conflict resolution fails because individuals, groups, and external powers .choose. war and often prefer it over peaceful alternatives.  .

Affection

导师

http://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/183327.jpg