找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science; Erik J. Olsson,Sebastian Enqvist Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 AGM Theo

[复制链接]
查看: 44488|回复: 50
发表于 2025-3-21 19:14:29 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science
影响因子2023Erik J. Olsson,Sebastian Enqvist
视频video
发行地址The only up-to-date book that addresses belief revision in the context of scientific enquiry Provides a number of new perspectives that are likely to steer research in new directions Establishes new c
学科分类Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science
图书封面Titlebook: Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science;  Erik J. Olsson,Sebastian Enqvist Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 AGM Theo
影响因子Belief revision theory and philosophy of science both aspire to shed light on the dynamics ofknowledge – on how our view of the world changes (typically) in the light of new evidence. Yet these two areas of research have long seemed strangely detached from each other, as witnessed by the small number of cross-references and researchers working in both domains.One may speculate as to what has brought about this surprising, and perhaps unfortunate, state of affairs. One factor may be that while belief revision theory has traditionally been pursued in a bottom- up manner, focusing on the endeavors of single inquirers, philosophers of science, inspired by logical empiricism, have tended to be more interested in science as a multi-agent or agent-independent phenomenon.
Pindex Book 2011
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science网络公开度




书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science被引频次




书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science被引频次学科排名




书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science年度引用




书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science年度引用学科排名




书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science读者反馈




书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:03:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:39:49 | 显示全部楼层
Industrie 4.0 in der Textilproduktionherence, which shows how political and economic goals can bias the evaluation of evidence and produce irrational rejection of claims about global warming. Finally, we argue that explanatory coherence gives a better account of belief revision than major alternatives including logicist and Bayesian theories.
发表于 2025-3-22 05:50:25 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2011ly) in the light of new evidence. Yet these two areas of research have long seemed strangely detached from each other, as witnessed by the small number of cross-references and researchers working in both domains.One may speculate as to what has brought about this surprising, and perhaps unfortunate,
发表于 2025-3-22 10:52:19 | 显示全部楼层
Dieter Steegmüller,Michael Zürnds. Finally, I argue that part of what feeds the functionalist-relationalist controversy is a false dilemma based on an implausible conception of what it means rationally to suspend judgment. Making this precise requires a formal framework that includes a representation of the agent’s research agenda.
发表于 2025-3-22 14:56:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:55:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:49:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:40:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 09:16:00 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-30 00:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表