找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Being Apart from Reasons; The Role of Reasons Cláudio Michelon Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Deliberation.Habermas.J

[复制链接]
查看: 51813|回复: 39
发表于 2025-3-21 16:10:40 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Being Apart from Reasons
期刊简称The Role of Reasons
影响因子2023Cláudio Michelon
视频video
发行地址Compares public and private decision-making, proving them to be ethically different.Raises an original objection against Neutralist Liberalism (e.g Rawls).Raises an original objection to Joseph Raz’s
学科分类Law and Philosophy Library
图书封面Titlebook: Being Apart from Reasons; The Role of Reasons  Cláudio Michelon Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Deliberation.Habermas.J
影响因子.Being Apart from Reasons. deals with the question of how we should go about using reasons to decide what to do. More particularly, the book presents objections to the most common response given by contemporary legal and political theorists to the moral complexity of decision-making in modern societies, namely: the attempt to release public agents from their argumentative burden by insulating a particular set of reasons from the general pool of reasons and assigning the former systematic priority over all other reasons. ..That strategy is apparent both in Rawls’ claim that reasons concerning the right are systematically prior to reasons concerning the good and in Raz’s claim that pre-emptive reasons are systematically prior to first-order reasons. The same strategy is also instantiated by certain arguments for the procedural value of law, such as Jeremy Waldron’s. In the book, each of those arguments for the insulation of reasons is objected to in order to defend the thesis the reasoning by public agents must always be as comprehensive as possible...The remaining chapters object to those arguments mentioned above which aim at justifying the exclusion of certain reasons from public
Pindex Book 2006
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Being Apart from Reasons影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Being Apart from Reasons影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Being Apart from Reasons网络公开度




书目名称Being Apart from Reasons网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Being Apart from Reasons被引频次




书目名称Being Apart from Reasons被引频次学科排名




书目名称Being Apart from Reasons年度引用




书目名称Being Apart from Reasons年度引用学科排名




书目名称Being Apart from Reasons读者反馈




书目名称Being Apart from Reasons读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:00:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:51:43 | 显示全部楼层
Being Apart from Reasons978-1-4020-4283-6Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
发表于 2025-3-22 07:35:28 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4283-3Deliberation; Habermas; John Rawls; Jürgen Habermas; Legal Reasoning; Moral Reasoning; Public Decision-Mak
发表于 2025-3-22 12:37:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:47:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:39:27 | 显示全部楼层
Modernity: Urban Culture and the Balkans,efs arrived at through reasoning and, second, at demonstrating how a substantive argument for this thesis would be able to defeat the argument that if reasoning brings about more certainty about what is morally correct, it follows that one should always reason before acting. To be sure, the thesis t
发表于 2025-3-22 22:43:55 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21571-3g, even if one accepts that reasoning brings more certainty about the morally correct course of action. In the present chapter I turn to the problem of whether or not reasons of that kind can justify that a public agent is not obliged to reason before acting in the exercise of her public office. Not
发表于 2025-3-23 03:33:26 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21571-3 they not always to .. We saw in the first chapter that there are good reasons to believe that reasons are not always the best ‘motive’ for action. That an action is brought about as a result of stimulating an agent’s settled dispositions of character might be not only morally acceptable, but also m
发表于 2025-3-23 09:30:19 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-22 16:00
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表