找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Axiomatic Method and Category Theory; Andrei Rodin Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Categorical logic.David Hi

[复制链接]
查看: 40526|回复: 49
发表于 2025-3-21 16:30:54 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Axiomatic Method and Category Theory
影响因子2023Andrei Rodin
视频video
发行地址Offers readers a coherent look at the past, present and anticipated future of the Axiomatic Method.Provides a deep textual analysis of Euclid, Hilbert, and Lawvere that describes how their ideas are d
学科分类Synthese Library
图书封面Titlebook: Axiomatic Method and Category Theory;  Andrei Rodin Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Categorical logic.David Hi
影响因子.This volume explores the many different meanings of the notion of the axiomatic method, offering an insightful historical and philosophical discussion about how these notions changed over the millennia. .The author, a well-known philosopher and historian of mathematics, first examines Euclid, who is considered the father of the axiomatic method, before moving onto Hilbert and Lawvere. He then presents a deep textual analysis of each writer and describes how their ideas are different and even how their ideas progressed over time. Next, the book explores category theory and details how it has revolutionized the notion of the axiomatic method. It considers the question of identity/equality in mathematics as well as examines the received theories of mathematical structuralism. In the end,. .Rodin. .presents a hypothetical New Axiomatic Method, which establishes closer relationships between mathematics and physics..Lawvere‘s axiomatization of topos theory and Voevodsky‘s axiomatization of higher homotopy theory exemplify a new way of axiomatic theory building, which goes beyond the classical Hilbert-style Axiomatic Method. The new notion of Axiomatic Method that emerges in categorical
Pindex Book 2014
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Axiomatic Method and Category Theory影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Axiomatic Method and Category Theory影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Axiomatic Method and Category Theory网络公开度




书目名称Axiomatic Method and Category Theory网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Axiomatic Method and Category Theory被引频次




书目名称Axiomatic Method and Category Theory被引频次学科排名




书目名称Axiomatic Method and Category Theory年度引用




书目名称Axiomatic Method and Category Theory年度引用学科排名




书目名称Axiomatic Method and Category Theory读者反馈




书目名称Axiomatic Method and Category Theory读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:15:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:53:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:51:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:20:41 | 显示全部楼层
Lawvere: Pursuit of Objectivity the current mathematical practice (“applications”). It is opposed in this sense to the “Bolzano-Frege-Peano-Russell tradition” (making part of today’s Analytic philosophy), which attempts to provide Formal Axiomatic Method with a philosophical underpinning disregarding its problematic status in the context of the current mathematical research.
发表于 2025-3-22 14:22:36 | 显示全部楼层
Identity in Classical and Constructive Mathematicstes the apple when green, and B when it is red then . = . (it is the same thing) but the properties of . and . are different: they have a different color. This is at odds with the Indiscernibility of Identicals thesis according to which identical things have identical properties.
发表于 2025-3-22 17:45:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:47:33 | 显示全部楼层
New Axiomatic Method (Instead of Conclusion)on and concentration” (Lawvere 2003, p. 213) and generalize upon some examples of axiomatic thinking due to Lawvere and Voevodsky. I begin with the unification, then turn to the concentration and, finally, discuss the place and the special character of logic in the New Axiomatic Method.
发表于 2025-3-23 02:55:25 | 显示全部楼层
Humanistic Pedagogy Across the Disciplinesbe by far more common and easier to justify than today. It is sufficient to say that it made part of Kant’s view on mathematics, and that Kant’s view on mathematics remained extremely influential until the very end of the nineteenth century.
发表于 2025-3-23 07:40:47 | 显示全部楼层
Angela Rinaldi,Rebecca Pawloskiants to interpret it in modern terms; in order to see the difference between the modern mathematical thinking and older ways of mathematical thinking one wants to avoid anachronisms and understand the old text in its own terms (Unguru 1975).
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-19 09:26
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表