找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Axiological Pluralism; Jurisdiction, Law-Ma Lucia Busatta,Carlo Casonato Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under e

[复制链接]
楼主: Braggart
发表于 2025-3-23 10:26:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 14:41:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 19:42:59 | 显示全部楼层
Patients’ Rights at the End of Life in Chilean Juridical System. Legal and Jurisprudential Analysis onception of autonomy, which dwindles patients’ abilities of self-determination. Given such legal context, biolaw can play a key role in designing and establishing effective biojuridical models to solve conflicts between different moral values and visions, arisen in jurisdictional and para-jurisdict
发表于 2025-3-24 01:38:30 | 显示全部楼层
Research Ethics Committeeslisation. Lastly, I will provide some practical information as a member of two research ethics committees in Spain, the Bioethics Committee at the University of Barcelona and the Research Ethics Committee at Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, to draw some conclusions and make proposals.
发表于 2025-3-24 03:51:20 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 07:12:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 13:24:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 17:33:17 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,ffered by the technological development daily pose new issues and challenges. Parliaments should intervene to accommodate this pluralism, but they are often late in providing rules, and courts have to stand in for them.
发表于 2025-3-24 20:28:49 | 显示全部楼层
Professional Medical EthicsMEs from a comparative perspective, the present essay sketches some of the most significant and multifaceted interactions between the law and the CME, stressing how professional ethics is at the same time an element of axiological and legal pluralism (“inside” and “outside” the profession) and a tool that (potentially) accommodates pluralism.
发表于 2025-3-25 00:54:55 | 显示全部楼层
Patients’ Rights at the End of Life in Chilean Juridical System. Legal and Jurisprudential Analysis apid evolution of new healthcare quandaries and define a legal way to regulate healthcare practices at the end of life, as well as to delimit normative impact of them in our society, within so sensitive axiological contexts such as individual autonomy and the right to self-determine the vital project.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-19 01:53
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表