找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology; William O‘Donohue,Akihiko Masuda,Scott Lilienfeld Textbook 2022 Springer N

[复制链接]
查看: 19673|回复: 62
发表于 2025-3-21 18:46:28 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology
影响因子2023William O‘Donohue,Akihiko Masuda,Scott Lilienfeld
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/168/167695/167695.mp4
发行地址Presents a comprehensive, accessible analysis of the replication crisis.Suggests strategies to combat the negative effects of QRPs and promote research transparency.A practical resource for students,
图书封面Titlebook: Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology;  William O‘Donohue,Akihiko Masuda,Scott Lilienfeld Textbook 2022 Springer N
影响因子This authoritative volume presents a detailed analysis of the replication crisis and the use of questionable research practices (QRPs) in psychology, as well as recommended practices for combatting these problems. Ultimately, the book aims to provide a comprehensive, current, and accessible account of the adverse effects of QRPs..The replication crisis in psychology and allied fields has exposed critical flaws in the standard views of research methods, which allow for extensive flexibility in data analysis by investigators and permit the widespread use of QRPs. Chapters examine the intentional use of QRPs such as data fabrication and falsification, along with subtler, unintentional practices such as p-hacking and HARKING (hypothesizing after results are known). Drawing on the growing awareness of these problems, contributors also highlight potential strategies to detect QRPs and minimize their negative impact through open data practices, preregistration of hypotheses and analyses, and adversarial collaborations, in which investigators holding opposing positions on a scientific issue agree to work together on a study in an effort to counteract their respective biases. .Among the top
Pindex Textbook 2022
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology网络公开度




书目名称Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology被引频次




书目名称Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology被引频次学科排名




书目名称Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology年度引用




书目名称Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology年度引用学科排名




书目名称Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology读者反馈




书目名称Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:16:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:26:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:12:06 | 显示全部楼层
History of Replication Failures in Psychology less than half of a sample of 100 studies successfully replicated. Since that time, other large-scale replication attempts have echoed the worrisome state of psychological science. Dubbed “the replication crisis,” this dilemma in the sciences is twofold; not only are replication studies rarely cond
发表于 2025-3-22 11:30:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:53:37 | 显示全部楼层
Data Detective Methods for Revealing Questionable Research Practicester discusses some methods for detecting the presence of QRPs, mostly by looking for conflicts in different sources of information. These methods typically cannot identify precisely which QRPs were used, and sometimes the conflicts are due to typos or simple mistakes, but either way readers should b
发表于 2025-3-22 18:14:27 | 显示全部楼层
Controversies Regarding Null Hypothesis Significance Testinghnical description of perhaps the most useful NHST alternative, Bayesian methods. We then provide illustrations of an unnecessary, tragic consequence of using NHST in a series of individual studies: The inability to incorporate previous findings when analyzing a new dataset. This is accompanied by i
发表于 2025-3-23 00:25:53 | 显示全部楼层
Hypothesizing After Results Are Known: HARKingng After Results Are Known (HARKing) threatens all of these values, and therefore is a threat to science itself. A commitment to reducing the prevalence of HARKing does not mean a stifling of exploration or creativity; indeed, these are at the core of discovery. Instead, that commitment is about pre
发表于 2025-3-23 03:19:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:15:59 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-7-15 08:30
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表