找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: A New Gender Equality Contract for Europe; Feminism and Progres Andrea Pető,Laeticia Thissen,Amandine Clavaud Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2025 The Editor(

[复制链接]
查看: 35669|回复: 42
发表于 2025-3-21 19:41:24 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称A New Gender Equality Contract for Europe
期刊简称Feminism and Progres
影响因子2023Andrea Pető,Laeticia Thissen,Amandine Clavaud
视频video
发行地址This book is open access, which means that you have free and unlimited access.Gathers gender expert voices with multidisciplinary backgrounds to launch a comprehensive reflection.Covers political refl
图书封面Titlebook: A New Gender Equality Contract for Europe; Feminism and Progres Andrea Pető,Laeticia Thissen,Amandine Clavaud Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2025 The Editor(
影响因子.This open access book, supported by FEPS and Fondation Jean-Jaurès, centres on the work of contemporary progressive feminist thinkers and the idea that there is no democracy without gender equality. The authors develop the concept of a feminism that works for everyone – regardless of their gender, social or cultural identity – in the context of EU policy. The book features gender experts with multidisciplinary backgrounds from across Europe, providing a comprehensive exploration of efforts to move away from “gender backlash” rhetoric and towards a new gender contract for a fairer, more equal European Union..
Pindex Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2025
The information of publication is updating

书目名称A New Gender Equality Contract for Europe影响因子(影响力)




书目名称A New Gender Equality Contract for Europe影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称A New Gender Equality Contract for Europe网络公开度




书目名称A New Gender Equality Contract for Europe网络公开度学科排名




书目名称A New Gender Equality Contract for Europe被引频次




书目名称A New Gender Equality Contract for Europe被引频次学科排名




书目名称A New Gender Equality Contract for Europe年度引用




书目名称A New Gender Equality Contract for Europe年度引用学科排名




书目名称A New Gender Equality Contract for Europe读者反馈




书目名称A New Gender Equality Contract for Europe读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

1票 100.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:19:12 | 显示全部楼层
s with multidisciplinary backgrounds from across Europe, providing a comprehensive exploration of efforts to move away from “gender backlash” rhetoric and towards a new gender contract for a fairer, more equal European Union..978-3-031-59995-8978-3-031-59993-4
发表于 2025-3-22 01:39:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:38:22 | 显示全部楼层
Imagining a New Gender Contract for Climate, for an alternative based on a rationality of policymaking grounded in care through responsiveness, empathy and solidarity with others. This alternative governance practice is explained and illustrated in some detail with concrete options for policymakers.
发表于 2025-3-22 09:23:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:58:02 | 显示全部楼层
Grundbegriffe der grünen Gentechniko lose momentum. The EU . take leadership in this area as a matter of urgency, and the chapter puts forward some suggestions on how to move forward. Until a clear commitment and concrete measures are in place, any intervention will continue to be empty rhetoric.
发表于 2025-3-22 19:56:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:33:35 | 显示全部楼层
Imagining a New Gender Contract for Labour,isis, and in particular that linked to Covid-19, has revealed all the inequalities suffered by women, particularly in the workplace. The aim of this chapter is to look back at the current trends and challenges facing women in the workplace, and to sketch out the contours of a genuine feminist democratisation of work.
发表于 2025-3-23 03:30:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 09:22:24 | 显示全部楼层
Imagining a New Gender Contract for Democracy,hen examine the current challenges that need to be overcome to address this issue from two angles: the connection between descriptive and substantive representation, and the overlap between inequalities and demands from an intersectional perspective.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-8 00:46
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表