Titlebook: Automated Web Site Evaluation; Researchers’ and Pra Melody Y. Ivory Book 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003 Accessibility.

相互影响

978-90-481-6446-2Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

lethal

加剧

Melody Y. IvoryDocuments the current state of the field and highlights promising research and tool development directions

直言不讳

Human–Computer Interaction Serieshttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/166385.jpg

贞洁

Tonometry

Shunlin Liang,Xiaotong Zhang,Xiang Zhaouation methods in general, and automated evaluation methods in particular. We point out the limitations of existing frameworks and describe an expanded taxonomy for classifying evaluation automation. We summarize the application of this taxonomy to 84 methods, and in the process, we characterize the

left-ventricle

noxious

Vito Amendolagine,Roberta Rabellottito a set of guidelines. Guidelines can range from highly specific prescriptions to broad principles, and unlike other evaluation methods, inspections rely solely on the evaluator’s judgment. A large number of detailed usability guidelines exist for evaluating web interfaces (e.g., [Comber, 1995; Det

不连贯

CUMB

d’Artis Kancs,Boriss Siliverstovsser, these methods enable the evaluator to inexpensively predict usability. A wide range of modeling techniques have been developed for non-web interfaces, and they support different types of analyses as discussed in [Ivory, 2001; Ivory and Hearst, 2001]. We are not aware of analytical modeling appr