Titlebook: Automated Grammatical Error Detection for Language Learners; Claudia Leacock,Martin Chodorow,Joel Tetreault Book 2010 Springer Nature Swit

对将来事件

书目名称Automated Grammatical Error Detection for Language Learners影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Automated Grammatical Error Detection for Language Learners影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Automated Grammatical Error Detection for Language Learners网络公开度




书目名称Automated Grammatical Error Detection for Language Learners网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Automated Grammatical Error Detection for Language Learners被引频次




书目名称Automated Grammatical Error Detection for Language Learners被引频次学科排名




书目名称Automated Grammatical Error Detection for Language Learners年度引用




书目名称Automated Grammatical Error Detection for Language Learners年度引用学科排名




书目名称Automated Grammatical Error Detection for Language Learners读者反馈




书目名称Automated Grammatical Error Detection for Language Learners读者反馈学科排名

Foreknowledge

Visualizing Astrocytes of the Optic Nerve,ommas and semicolons, to confuse homophones, and to write run-on sentences. But language learners also make errors that occur comparatively infrequently in writing by native speakers. This is especially true for errors where usage is guided by complex rules that interact with one another, or where n

戏服

https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34773-9ived in electronic form. Currently, however, a number of corpora are being developed, some of considerable size, that contain rich error annotations. These corpora can be used for a number of purposes such as error analysis and studies of the influence of L1 on learner errors. And, of course, these

JAMB

Paul J. Foster MD,Ravi Thomas MDher NLP areas, grammatical error detection does not have a shared task/repository to establish agreed upon standards for evaluation (and annotation). For example, SensEval provides researchers with annotated corpora for word sense disambiguation, where any researcher can download training and test d

烦躁的女人

Paul L. Kaufman MD, PhD,B’Ann True Gabeltese two error types. First, as we have seen in Chapter 3, prepositions and articles are notoriously difficult for English learners to master, so they represent a large subset of learner errors. Second, there has been a growing body of literature on the prediction of articles and prepositions in text

削减

Paul L. Kaufman MD, PhD,B’Ann True Gabeltd meaning, words also show tendencies or preferences in the ways they combine. As we noted in Chapter 3, native speakers of English know that the noun phrase . is preferred over ., even though both are grammatically and semantically well formed. Examples of such arbitrary, conventional usage appear

ELUDE

Update on Tube-Shunt Procedures for Glaucomalocations. While those three dominate current NLP work in grammatical error detection, there are interesting approaches for other error types as well. In this chapter, we review some of the work on different kinds of errors that language learners make. Specifically, we look at approaches for disting

使害怕

genesis

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18633-2archers have used to enhance system performance by relying on very large corpora, such as the World Wide Web, by using machine translation technology, and by developing models of common learner errors. The second section discusses one important aspect of error detection that has not been addressed b

胖人手艺好

,What’s New in Laser Therapy for Glaucoma,e introduction, we noted that this an exciting area of research because there is the potential for real impact given the vast number of people learning another language and because there is no shortage of interesting problems that need to be solved.