Titlebook: At Arm’s Length; The European Union a Terrence R. Guay Book 1998 Terrence R. Guay 1998 Europe.European Commission.European security.Europea

MAIM

Fracture

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2172-0er also provides an important background to Chapter 6, which will examine the views of defense industry executives and other interest groups. Business leaders have different ideas about an EU role in defense industry matters. The following discussion provides the context that has helped to shape their opinions on this subject.

裙带关系

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4406-6al, goods, and services to move more freely within the EU, illustrating successful integration in what is sometimes referred to as ‘low politics’. From an economic perspective, Europe today looks markedly different than it did when the Treaty of Rome was signed in 1957 to create the European Economi

入伍仪式

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2172-0to describe some of the major characteristics of Europe’s defense industry, as well as recent trends in this sector. This exercise should help to develop an appreciation for the magnitude of the international forces acting upon Europe’s defense industry, as will be discussed in Chapter 4. This chapt

支形吊灯

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2172-0owing discussion, the EU’s involvement in defense industry matters remains limited. Yet some EU policies do have an effect on European defense firms, and significantly more of an effect today than in 1958 or even 1978. An explanation of why the EU has become involved in this policy area will be the

磨碎

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9047-3an Union (EU) in this process are not taking place within a vacuum. There are international forces that are influencing decisions being made by industry executives and politicians inside and outside the EU. These global factors are primarily of a political and economic nature, although technological

受人支配

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9047-3ize their power in the international arena by pursuing policies which bring the most benefits to them — or at least minimize their losses. However, the goals and policies of individual states are often shaped by the domestic politics that take place within them. In the context of the European Union

忍受

Heinz-Otto Peitgen,Evan Maletsky,Lee Yunkeraps the best explanation for why European-level interest groups have become the subject of so much scholarly work is that the way policy-making is made has changed since the 1985 Single European Act (SEA). The SEA and Maastricht Treaty expanded the scope of Community policies to include policy areas

Affectation

generic