找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Arthropod Relationships; R. A. Fortey,R. H. Thomas Book 1998 The Systematics Association 1998 Crustacea.Euarthropoda.Evolution.Fauna.Myria

[复制链接]
查看: 33556|回复: 65
发表于 2025-3-21 17:23:26 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Arthropod Relationships
影响因子2023R. A. Fortey,R. H. Thomas
视频video
学科分类The Systematics Association Special Volume Series
图书封面Titlebook: Arthropod Relationships;  R. A. Fortey,R. H. Thomas Book 1998 The Systematics Association 1998 Crustacea.Euarthropoda.Evolution.Fauna.Myria
影响因子The arthropods contain more species than any other animalgroup, but the evolutionary pathways which led to their currentdiversity are still an issue of controversy. .ArthropodRelationships. provides an overview of our current understanding,responding to the new data arising from sequencing DNA, the discoveryof new Cambrian fossils as direct evidence of early arthropod history,and developmental genetics. These new areas of research havestimulated a reconsideration of classical morphology and embryology..Arthropod. .Relationships. is the first synthesis of thecurrent debate to emerge: not since the volume edited by Gupta waspublished in 1979 has the arthropod phylogeny debate been, consideredin this depth and breadth. .Leaders in the various branches of arthropod biology have contributedto this volume. Chapters focus progressively from the general issuesto the specific problems involving particular groups, and thence to aconsideration of embryology and genetics. This wide range ofdisciplines is drawn on to approach an understanding of arthropodrelationships, and to provide the most timely account of arthropodphylogeny. .This book should be read by evolutionary biologists, palaeontolo
Pindex Book 1998
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Arthropod Relationships影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Arthropod Relationships影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Arthropod Relationships网络公开度




书目名称Arthropod Relationships网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Arthropod Relationships被引频次




书目名称Arthropod Relationships被引频次学科排名




书目名称Arthropod Relationships年度引用




书目名称Arthropod Relationships年度引用学科排名




书目名称Arthropod Relationships读者反馈




书目名称Arthropod Relationships读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:48:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:13:53 | 显示全部楼层
A defence of arthropod polyphyly,f several disciplines. Furthermore, some maintain that the only correct approach to the problems of arthropod phylogeny is via cladistics (presumably supported by DNA sequence data for extant forms). One consequence of this is that some of the most important contributions to our understanding of the
发表于 2025-3-22 07:15:21 | 显示全部楼层
, genes and annelid-arthropod relationships,title, nor can I think of a worse one. For the phrasing of the title implies that annelids have some special relationship to arthropods, such as that formalized by Cuvier nearly 200 years ago with his Phylum Articulata. It also might imply that homeobox genes can either provide insights into how ove
发表于 2025-3-22 09:53:15 | 显示全部楼层
Arthropod and annelid relationships re-examined, other animal groups nearer to annelids; under this view arthropods do not belong to the clade, Eutrochozoa Ghiselin, 1988, comprising annelids, molluscs, and several other protostome phyla. This recent work is based on both morphology (Eernisse ., 1992; Schram and Ellis, 1995) and molecular sequenc
发表于 2025-3-22 15:10:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:11:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:23:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:18:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:35:42 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-2 07:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表