Titlebook: Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment; A Defense of State S David T. Schwartz Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2000 P

加冕

书目名称Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment网络公开度




书目名称Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment被引频次




书目名称Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment被引频次学科排名




书目名称Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment年度引用




书目名称Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment年度引用学科排名




书目名称Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment读者反馈




书目名称Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment读者反馈学科排名

notification

The Tradition of Subsidy: Art and Cultural Perfection,government funding is justified because art has intrinsic value. The chapter begins by presenting the basic perfectionist argument, while subsequent sections each examine a distinct mode of criticizing that argument. One sort of criticism focuses on perfectionism as a political principle, including

狗舍

The Commitment to Democracy,subsidy. The remainder of this book seeks to formulate such an alternative. Rather than claiming a life with art is intrinsically superior to other ways of living, the book argues the arts are . valuable to what is perhaps our most widely-held public value—democratic self-rule. This chapter lays the

吞噬

Empathy, Interpretation, and Judgment: The Case for Art,ust opportunities for political education. While claims are often and easily made about art’s value for . education, here I build on Chapter Two in arguing that the arts also have important value for . education. To make the case for art as democratic education, this chapter describes how aesthetica

遗留之物

Munificent

香料

BOLUS

浸软

侵略者

Book 2000of the arts-is cast in the Anglo­ American tradition of analytical philosophy. Here normative arguments of ethics and politics are scrutinized with an eye toward developing a defensible justification of state action. Yet while the book initially situates the subsidy problem within this analytical tr