Titlebook: Aristotle; A Collection of Crit J. M. E. Moravcsik Book 1967 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1967 Aristotle.

Sparkle

书目名称Aristotle影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Aristotle影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Aristotle网络公开度




书目名称Aristotle网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Aristotle被引频次




书目名称Aristotle被引频次学科排名




书目名称Aristotle年度引用




书目名称Aristotle年度引用学科排名




书目名称Aristotle读者反馈




书目名称Aristotle读者反馈学科排名

incision

动物

Left-Atrium

Meander

Categories in Aristotle and in Kantties, with an infinite regress. That fallacy has been already sufficiently exposed. There is no universal of universalityness of which the universalities of universals would be particulars, for the universality of one genus universal as distinguished from that of another lies not in its being a unit

芦笋

The Final Good in Aristotle’s elves, there must be some object which is desired for itself. The passage further suggests that, if there were one such object and one only, this fact would be important and helpful for the conduct of life.

尽忠

Introduction to consider, briefly, some of the features of the history of philosophy and some of the characteristics of Aristotle’s philosophy. Even if this necessarily sketchy introductory discussion fails to yield answers satisfactory to everyone, it should at least help to make clear why this volume is the w

摸索

Aristotle’s Different Possibilitiesibility. This notion is closely connected with the other modal notions, notably with those of necessity and impossibility. Since these notions are somewhat more perspicuous than that of possibility, it is advisable to start from them.

Magnitude

On Aristotle’s Square of Oppositionst it.. The main argument in this defense, as I understood it, is the contention that the principle of excluded middle, or the principle that “every meaningful statement is either true or false,” is subject to certain qualifications. These qualifications have nothing to do with multivalued logics or

冒号

Categories in Aristotle and in Kants (or parts) of it. Suppose now an abstraction beginning from individual things till we come to so-called ., or, as they would be more correctly termed, .. The universalities of all other universals would be comprised in the universalities of these, not as their particulars but as kinds, forms, part