找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence; Guillermo Simari,Iyad Rahwan Book 2009 Springer-Verlag US 2009 Bayesian network.agents.argument

[复制链接]
查看: 49937|回复: 56
发表于 2025-3-21 20:05:33 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence
影响因子2023Guillermo Simari,Iyad Rahwan
视频video
发行地址A confluence of deep exposition and comprehensive exploration by leading researchers of the underlying themes in the various areas of Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence.A progressive development
图书封面Titlebook: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence;  Guillermo Simari,Iyad Rahwan Book 2009 Springer-Verlag US 2009 Bayesian network.agents.argument
影响因子Argumentation is all around us. Letters to the Editor often make points of cons- tency, and “Why” is one of the most frequent questions in language, asking for r- sons behind behaviour. And argumentation is more than ‘reasoning’ in the recesses of single minds, since it crucially involves interaction. It cements the coordinated social behaviour that has allowed us, in small bands of not particularly physically impressive primates, to dominate the planet, from the mammoth hunt all the way up to organized science. This volume puts argumentation on the map in the eld of Arti cial Intelligence. This theme has been coming for a while, and some famous pioneers are chapter authors, but we can now see a broader systematic area emerging in the sum of topics and results. As a logician, I nd this intriguing, since I see AI as ‘logic continued by other means’, reminding us of broader views of what my discipline is about. Logic arose originally out of re ection on many-agent practices of disputation, in Greek Ant- uity, but also in India and China. And logicians like me would like to return to this broader agenda of rational agency and intelligent interaction. Of course, Aristotle also gave us
Pindex Book 2009
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence网络公开度




书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence被引频次




书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence被引频次学科排名




书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence年度引用




书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence年度引用学科排名




书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence读者反馈




书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:29:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 00:39:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:04:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 11:35:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:54:10 | 显示全部楼层
Argumentation for Decision Makingt the preferences of the decision maker. This agent is assumed to behave in a . way [29] amgoud-woold, at least in the sense that his decisions should be as much as possible consistent with his preferences.
发表于 2025-3-22 18:12:38 | 显示全部楼层
ntation in Artificial Intelligence.A progressive developmentArgumentation is all around us. Letters to the Editor often make points of cons- tency, and “Why” is one of the most frequent questions in language, asking for r- sons behind behaviour. And argumentation is more than ‘reasoning’ in the rece
发表于 2025-3-22 22:05:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:11:59 | 显示全部楼层
Experimental Methods of Shock Wave Researcherred extensions establishes that its claim must be accepted as true, and membership of at least one preferred extension shows that the claim is at least tenable. In consequence, that admissible sets of arguments are conflict free is an important requirement under all the various semantics.
发表于 2025-3-23 06:15:19 | 显示全部楼层
Rengarajan Sriram,Gopalan Jagadeeshack another argument, but it can also support another one. This suggests a notion of bipolarity, .. the existence of two independent kinds of information which have a diametrically opposed nature and which represent repellent forces.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-17 13:07
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表