找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Argumentation Machines; New Frontiers in Arg Chris Reed,Timothy J. Norman Book 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004 artifici

[复制链接]
查看: 49074|回复: 37
发表于 2025-3-21 19:55:18 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Argumentation Machines
期刊简称New Frontiers in Arg
影响因子2023Chris Reed,Timothy J. Norman
视频video
学科分类Argumentation Library
图书封面Titlebook: Argumentation Machines; New Frontiers in Arg Chris Reed,Timothy J. Norman Book 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004 artifici
影响因子In the late 1990s, AI witnessed an increasing use of the term ‘argumentation‘ within its bounds: in natural language processing, in user interface design, in logic programming and nonmonotonic reasoning, in Al‘s interface with the legal community, and in the newly emerging field of multi-agent systems. It seemed to me that many of these uses of argumentation were inspired by (of­ ten inspired) guesswork, and that a great majority of the AI community were unaware that there was a maturing, rich field of research in Argumentation Theory (and Critical Thinking and Informal Logic) that had been steadily re­ building a scholarly approach to the area over the previous twenty years or so. Argumentation Theory, on its side; was developing theories and approaches that many in the field felt could have a role more widely in research and soci­ ety, but were for the most part unaware that AI was one of the best candidates for such application.
Pindex Book 2004
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Argumentation Machines影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Argumentation Machines影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Argumentation Machines网络公开度




书目名称Argumentation Machines网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Argumentation Machines被引频次




书目名称Argumentation Machines被引频次学科排名




书目名称Argumentation Machines年度引用




书目名称Argumentation Machines年度引用学科排名




书目名称Argumentation Machines读者反馈




书目名称Argumentation Machines读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:45:46 | 显示全部楼层
Argument and Multi-Agent Systems,stems in which participants need to interact. Multiple interacting agents that engage in persuasive dialogue, negotiation and the construction of joint plans of action have the potential to provide argumentation theory with a means to implement and evaluate their theories. In this chapter we address
发表于 2025-3-22 01:49:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:40:01 | 显示全部楼层
Computational Models, Argumentation Theories and Legal Practice,ion of legal argument. Taking the perspective of a lawyer we develop a conceptual model intended to accommodate all stages involved in legal argument. We then relate Argumentation Theory and work in AI and Law to this conceptual model. We conclude by considering the scope for the two disciplines lea
发表于 2025-3-22 09:43:33 | 显示全部楼层
The Persuasion Machine,in order to persuade her of some point of view. The approach is to start with a focus upon breadth, and to bring structure to an ill-structured problem. From there, for each component and each subproblem, the linguistic, computational, rhetorical and argumentation-theoretic theory drivers are integr
发表于 2025-3-22 12:55:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:21:24 | 显示全部楼层
Norbert Fuhr,Paulo Quaresma,Nicola Ferrof the interdisciplinary field. By showing where such collaboration has been successful, it becomes easier to see the points at which renewed interaction between the fields might yield substantial gains. These points of potential growth are then briefly discussed to motivate and position the work des
发表于 2025-3-22 23:24:20 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:54:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:44:45 | 显示全部楼层
K. Selçuk Candan,Bogdan Ionescu,Nicola Ferroion of legal argument. Taking the perspective of a lawyer we develop a conceptual model intended to accommodate all stages involved in legal argument. We then relate Argumentation Theory and work in AI and Law to this conceptual model. We conclude by considering the scope for the two disciplines lea
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-18 15:32
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表