找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Arguing Fundamental Rights; Agustín José Menéndez,Erik Oddvar Eriksen Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Comparative Cons

[复制链接]
查看: 50994|回复: 40
发表于 2025-3-21 18:23:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Arguing Fundamental Rights
影响因子2023Agustín José Menéndez,Erik Oddvar Eriksen
视频video
发行地址Explores a uniquely sophisticated framework for arguing conflicts between fundamental rights.Offers keys to apply the leading theory of fundamental rights adjudication in Germany to any other European
学科分类Law and Philosophy Library
图书封面Titlebook: Arguing Fundamental Rights;  Agustín José Menéndez,Erik Oddvar Eriksen Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Comparative Cons
影响因子.Arguing Fundamental Rights explores the path-breaking Theory of Constitutional Rights of Robert Alexy. The critical analysis of the structural elements of Alexy’s theory is combined with an assessment of its applied relevance, with special attention being paid to the UK Human Rights Act and the fundamental rights protection in the European Union (before and after the Charter of Fundamental Rights of 2000). The book is unique in combining a challenging interpretation of one the foremost European conceptions of fundamental rights with the discussion of the pragmatics of constitutional adjudication. ..The chapters combine a focus on key political questions such as whether rights adjudication can be subject to rational assessment and whether judges (and not democratically elected parliaments) should be the umpires of fundamental rights protection, with a concern with key jurisprudential issues, such as the determination of the limits of fundamental rights, the binding effect of fundamental rights to private parties, or whether certain fundamental rights should or should not be regarded as ultimate reasons for action, and as such, could be not be limited, not even when it conflict with
Pindex Book 2006
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights网络公开度




书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights被引频次




书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights被引频次学科排名




书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights年度引用




书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights年度引用学科排名




书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights读者反馈




书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:18:47 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4919-4Comparative Constitutional Law; Constitutional Adjudication; Discourse Theory; Fundamental Rights; Hart;
发表于 2025-3-22 03:52:10 | 显示全部楼层
978-90-481-7227-6Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006
发表于 2025-3-22 07:00:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:54:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:40:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:27:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:36:02 | 显示全部楼层
Some Elements of a Theory of European Fundamental Rights
发表于 2025-3-23 05:18:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:36:15 | 显示全部楼层
1572-4395 fundamental rights to private parties, or whether certain fundamental rights should or should not be regarded as ultimate reasons for action, and as such, could be not be limited, not even when it conflict with978-90-481-7227-6978-1-4020-4919-4Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-24 16:01
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表