Titlebook: Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics; A Historical Perspec James C. Doig Book 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 20

大脑

书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics网络公开度




书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics被引频次




书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics被引频次学科排名




书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics年度引用




书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics年度引用学科排名




书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics读者反馈




书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics读者反馈学科排名

清真寺

1879-8578 a presentation of the foundation of Aquinas‘s moralphilosophy? Professor Doig answers these questions through anexamination of the historical context within which the .Sententia.was composed. .In Chapters 1-2, the work‘s role as a corrective of earliercommentaries is established. Chapter 3, by exami

EVADE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49777-6 human happiness. However, if the . were intended, as is so often claimed, as a theological transformation of Aristotle’s philosophical text, would Aquinas have been so intent on exposing the correct meaning of the .?

厨师

Immobilize

insert

BOAST

Lisa Schiefele,Stefanie Bohn,Simon Sachsproposed a philosophical interpretation of the .. In the present Chapter, I propose to examine the grounds which appear to have provided the greatest support for concluding that the . is a theological work. In this regard, Jaffa’s comparative study of the . and the . provides a useful focus.

使习惯于

思想

faultfinder

Dating the ,,roposed the . as having itself been written somewhat later than previously thought.. Consequently, Gauthier now dates the . after early 1271 and the . after the summer ofthat year, thus late 1271–1272. Yet Gauthier’s original dates of 1271–1272 for the ., as well as its posteriority relative to the ., continue to stand..