Titlebook: Applications of Heuristics and Biases to Social Issues; Linda Heath,R. Scott Tindale,Judith Myers Book 1994 Springer Science+Business Medi

暂时别动

催眠药

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3995-9judge probabilities and to make decisions under uncertain circumstances (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). They discussed the importance of these heuristics by reference to judgments about the guilt of a defendant, the outcome of an election, and the future value of the dollar. Their formulation spawned a

蚊帐

Omnipotent

micturition

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3995-9n though she knew that most lumps are benign, her first thought was that she had cancer. Ann’s doctor, Arlene Greenfield, reassured her that it was probably only a benign cyst: “Only 10% of movable, regularly shaped, lumps turn out to be cancer.” Nevertheless, Dr. Greenfield ordered a mammogram “jus

narcotic

Acid Deposition Effects on Soilsby Kahneman, Tversky, and others (Kahneman, Slovic, & Tversky, 1982; Nisbett & Ross, 1980) are descriptive of how psychologists and psychiatrists make judgments and decisions. Research on whether these heuristics and biases are descriptive of clinicians will be reviewed, comments will be made about

Tincture

Aggregate Stability to Drying and Wettingmining how judges organize, interpret, and use information about offenders is crucial to the explanation of this process and its outcomes. As Lawrence (1984) has noted, however, “little empirical evidence has been available on how judicial decisions are made” (p. 319). Since 1984, a few studies have