找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Animals, Race, and Multiculturalism; Luís Cordeiro-Rodrigues,Les Mitchell Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under

[复制链接]
楼主: Enlightening
发表于 2025-3-26 22:40:45 | 显示全部楼层
Is Multiculturalism , for Animals?,ssive for animals through a comparative analysis of one cultural arena: legal texts and reform. The analysis highlights the entrenched anthropocentrism of liberal legal systems as well as animal-friendly contemporary legal developments in the global South.
发表于 2025-3-27 03:17:42 | 显示全部楼层
Animals Off the Menu: A Racist Proposal?,consistent with veganism, implying that it is inconsistent to oppose racism and not oppose animal killing and harm. It concludes that anti-racism and veganism are appropriately considered as aligned social justice projects.
发表于 2025-3-27 06:49:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 09:47:28 | 显示全部楼层
Afterword: Realigning Multiculturalism and Animal Rights,uire elevating the human over the animal, in order to prevent processes of dehumanization? I suggest that once we disentangle these issues, there are untapped resources for a robustly multicultural and anti-racist vision of animal rights.
发表于 2025-3-27 17:32:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 21:47:32 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2662-3gard to traditions that breach fundamental moral dictates? More specifically, when forced to decide between the protection and preservation of religious traditions and the lives and welfare of anymals, where does multiculturalism stand?
发表于 2025-3-28 01:04:22 | 显示全部楼层
Kaporos: Multiculturalism, Ethics, and Anymals,gard to traditions that breach fundamental moral dictates? More specifically, when forced to decide between the protection and preservation of religious traditions and the lives and welfare of anymals, where does multiculturalism stand?
发表于 2025-3-28 03:31:45 | 显示全部楼层
Electronic Technology and the Lawa. However, insofar as the question of fox hunting also focuses attention strongly upon cruelty, it departs from the familiar suspicion (which they share) that a cruelty-focused discourse must also tend to reinforce anthropocentric norms.
发表于 2025-3-28 07:15:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 13:15:39 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-8 13:49
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表