Titlebook: Animals and Sociology; Kay Peggs Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2012 animals.consumption.culture

想象

Animals, Crime and Abuse,f crime are ‘animalized’ (Arluke and Sanders, 1996), the ways in which other animals are at risk from humans (e.g. through neglect and cruelty) and the ways in which humans use other animals for hazardous purposes (e.g. as status symbols and as weapons in gang violence). The chapter also explores th

Frisky

aesthetic

Animals, Leisure and Culture,s; however, other animals appear in all manifestations of ‘culture’. For example, ‘bullfighting’ is associated with Spanish culture; accusing someone of talking ‘bullshit’ in a meeting would be considered to be coarse; and the tale in the opera Carmen takes place on the day of a bullfight. Although

交响乐

Animal Experiments and Animal Rights,ther animals. Although I draw on a number of issues, the main focus of the chapter is on the contentious issue of experiments on other animals. Experiments on other animals are a major focus of political engagement, with campaigning groups advocating for and against such actions. The chapter provide

DIKE

Conclusions: Sociology for Other Animals,e away their lives; yet still they seem invisible to us. Sociology is part of the seeing of other animals and, although still somewhat marginal to sociology, that sociological seeing is changing things in sociology. However, it is not just seeing other animals that should be a central component of s

GORGE

International Economic Association Series. Although the history of the development of sociology and biology has been entwined (Fuller, 2006, p. 80), this entanglement has at times been less than harmonious, not least because sociology has sought to challenge biological deterministic notions about differences among humans. In this chapter I

licence

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02571-8le, gender, class and ‘race’. In addition, I draw on sociological thinking about difference, similarity and ‘otherness’ as central aspects of stratification and oppression. The chapter is organized around David Nibert’s (2002) theoretical framework, which sets out to explain the origins of the oppre

affect

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02571-8f crime are ‘animalized’ (Arluke and Sanders, 1996), the ways in which other animals are at risk from humans (e.g. through neglect and cruelty) and the ways in which humans use other animals for hazardous purposes (e.g. as status symbols and as weapons in gang violence). The chapter also explores th

seruting

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02571-8nstrate that, as a grouping, other animals are ‘subjected to all manner of sociospatial inclusions and exclusions’ (Philo, 1995, p. 655). In this chapter I explore spatial relationships between humans and other animals and examine how these are related to power relations. Thus I ask how are other an

Graduated

Christos Pitelis,Roger Sugden,Rachael Thomass; however, other animals appear in all manifestations of ‘culture’. For example, ‘bullfighting’ is associated with Spanish culture; accusing someone of talking ‘bullshit’ in a meeting would be considered to be coarse; and the tale in the opera Carmen takes place on the day of a bullfight. Although